fix: fix bugs #408
fix: fix bugs #408
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/controllers/nft.controller.ts (4)
Line range hint
40-54: Add error handling for Neo4j query executionThe Neo4j query construction and execution lacks proper error handling and validation.
- Validate platform existence before query execution
- Add error handling for Neo4j query execution
- Consider parameterizing the query for better security
+ if (!platform?.id) { + logger.error({ platform }, 'Invalid platform data for Neo4j query'); + throw new ApiError(400, 'Invalid platform configuration'); + } + const reputationScoreQuery = ` MATCH (:${NEO4J_PLATFORM_INFO[temp].member} {id: "${profile.profile.id}"})-[r:HAVE_METRICS {platformId: "${platform.id}"}]->(a) // ... rest of query `; - const neo4jData = await Neo4j.read(reputationScoreQuery); + let neo4jData; + try { + neo4jData = await Neo4j.read(reputationScoreQuery); + } catch (error) { + logger.error({ error, query: reputationScoreQuery }, 'Neo4j query failed'); + throw new ApiError(500, 'Failed to calculate reputation score'); + }
16-16: Fix typo in variable name 'repuationScore'The variable name has a typo which should be corrected for better code maintainability.
- let repuationScore; + let reputationScore; - repuationScore = _fields[_fieldLookup['reputation_score']]; + reputationScore = _fields[_fieldLookup['reputation_score']]; - return repuationScore; + return reputationScore;Also applies to: 65-65
Line range hint
79-83: Fix logical error in shouldProfilesExist functionThe condition
profiles.length < 0is impossible as array length cannot be negative.function shouldProfilesExist(profiles: Array<any>) { - if (profiles.length < 0) { + if (profiles.length === 0) { throw new ApiError(400, 'User has no any onchain profiles'); } }
Line range hint
16-69: Add validation using existing helper functionsThe
getReputationScorefunction doesn't utilize the existing validation helper functions, which could lead to unclear error scenarios.Add validation calls at appropriate points:
const profiles: Array<any> = await getProfilesOnAllSupportedChains(address); + shouldProfilesExist(profiles); const dynamicNftModule = await moduleService.getModuleByFilter({ 'options.platforms.0.metadata.tokenId': tokenId }); + shouldDynamicNftModuleExist(dynamicNftModule); for (let i = 0; i < supportedPlatforms.length; i++) { const platform = await platformService.getPlatformByFilter({ name: supportedPlatforms[i], community: dynamicNftModule?.community, }); + shouldPlatformExist(platform);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/controllers/nft.controller.ts(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/controllers/nft.controller.ts (1)
16-16: Verify the intentional removal of 'discourse' platform support
The removal of 'discourse' from supported platforms is a breaking change that could affect existing NFT reputation calculations. Please ensure this change is intentional and properly documented.
Consider:
- Adding a deprecation notice if this is temporary
- Documenting the change in release notes
- Implementing a migration path for existing 'discourse' users
src/controllers/nft.controller.ts
Outdated
| console.log(supportedPlatforms[i], dynamicNftModule?.community); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace console.log with structured logging
Using console.log for debugging is not recommended in production code. The codebase already has a proper logging setup with logger.debug.
Replace the console.log statements with structured logging:
- console.log(supportedPlatforms[i], dynamicNftModule?.community);
+ logger.debug({ platform: supportedPlatforms[i], community: dynamicNftModule?.community });
- console.log(platform, platform?.name as SupportedNeo4jPlatforms, 'BBB');
+ logger.debug({ platform, platformName: platform?.name });
- console.log(temp, 'HAHA');
+ logger.debug({ platformType: temp });
- console.log(repuationScore, _fieldLookup, _fields);
+ logger.debug({ repuationScore, fieldLookup: _fieldLookup, fields: _fields });Also applies to: 32-32, 38-38, 65-65
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/services/index.ts (1)
18-18: Consider documenting the NFT service's API contractGiven the significant changes mentioned in the PR summary (route changes from POST to GET, simplified reputation score logic), it would be valuable to document the NFT service's public API contract, especially the
getReputationScoremethod's parameters and return type.Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment in the service file:
/** * Service for NFT-related operations * @example * // Get reputation score * const score = await nftService.getReputationScore(tokenId, address); */src/services/nft.service.ts (2)
86-86: Avoid logging potentially sensitive dataLogging the entire Neo4j records may expose sensitive information. Consider limiting the logged data.
Modify the log statement:
-logger.debug(`Neo4j Records: ${JSON.stringify(records)}`); +logger.debug(`Neo4j query returned ${records.length} records`);
52-52: Make 'supportedChainIds' configurableThe
supportedChainIdsarray is hardcoded. For flexibility, consider loading it from a configuration file or environment variables.Example using environment variables:
import ociService from './oci.service'; function getProfiles(address: string) { let profiles: Array<any> = []; - const supportedChainIds = [11155111]; + const supportedChainIds = process.env.SUPPORTED_CHAIN_IDS?.split(',').map(Number) || [11155111]; for (let i = 0; i < supportedChainIds.length; i++) { // rest of the codeRemember to update your configuration files and environment settings accordingly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/controllers/nft.controller.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/v1/nft.route.ts(1 hunks)src/services/index.ts(2 hunks)src/services/nft.service.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/routes/v1/nft.route.ts (2)
Line range hint 8-12: LGTM! The change to GET method aligns with REST principles.
Using GET for retrieving reputation scores is more appropriate as it's an idempotent operation that doesn't modify server state.
Line range hint 8-12:
Changing the HTTP method from POST to GET is a breaking change that will affect API consumers.
Let's check for API documentation and potential client implementations that need updating:
src/controllers/nft.controller.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM! Clean import statement
The simplified imports align well with the refactored implementation.
11-11: Verify error handling in nftService
Since the controller's error handling has been simplified, we should verify that the service layer properly handles all edge cases previously covered by the removed validation functions.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is properly implemented in the service layer
The service layer has comprehensive error handling through:
- Custom
ApiErrorclass for structured error responses - Explicit validation functions that throw errors for edge cases:
throwErrorIfUserHasNoOnChainProfiles: Validates user has on-chain profilesthrowErrorIfDynamicNftModuleDoesNotExist: Validates NFT module existence
- Proper error propagation from dependencies (Neo4j, platform services)
- Detailed logging using a child logger for debugging and tracing
The removal of error handling from the controller is justified as the service layer adequately handles all validation and error cases.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check error handling in nftService implementation
# Look for error handling in nftService
ast-grep --pattern 'throw new Error($_)' src/services/nft.service.ts
# Check for try-catch blocks
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
} catch($_) {
$$$
}' src/services/nft.service.ts
# Look for validation checks
rg -A 3 "if.*throw" src/services/nft.service.ts
Length of output: 205
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's check if the file exists and see its content
fd "nft.service.ts" --type f
# If found, let's examine its content
fd "nft.service.ts" --type f --exec cat {}
# Let's also check for any error-related imports that might indicate error handling
rg "import.*Error" -A 2 --type ts
# Look for any custom error classes
fd -e ts -e js --type f --exec ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends Error {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 11963
src/services/index.ts (1)
18-18: LGTM! Service registration follows established pattern.
The addition of nftService follows the consistent pattern used for other services in this file. The import and export declarations are properly structured.
Let's verify the NFT service implementation exists and follows the expected service pattern:
Also applies to: 38-38
✅ Verification successful
Service implementation follows established patterns ✅
The NFT service follows the consistent patterns used across all services in the codebase:
- Uses the standard
export defaultpattern seen in all other service files - Exports a service object with well-defined methods
- Implementation includes proper type annotations and documentation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the NFT service implementation
# Expected: Find the service file and verify it exports a default service object
# Check if the NFT service file exists and examine its structure
if [[ -f "src/services/nft.service.ts" ]]; then
echo "NFT service file found. Checking implementation pattern:"
# Look for default export pattern
rg -A 5 "export default" "src/services/nft.service.ts"
else
echo "Warning: NFT service file not found at expected location"
# Search for possible alternative locations
fd -e ts -e js "nft.service"
fi
Length of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if the service follows the established pattern by:
# 1. Checking other service files for similar export patterns
# 2. Looking at the implementation of getReputationScore
# Check export patterns in other service files
echo "=== Export patterns in other services ==="
rg "export default" src/services/
# Check the implementation of getReputationScore
echo -e "\n=== NFT service implementation ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "getReputationScore" src/services/nft.service.ts
Length of output: 2203
| const reputationScore = await nftService.getReputationScore(tokenId, address); | ||
| res.send(reputationScore); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation and error handling
The simplified implementation could benefit from some essential safeguards:
- Input validation for
tokenIdandaddress - Explicit error handling for service failures
- Type checking of the response
Consider implementing these improvements:
const getReputationScore = catchAsync(async function (req: Request, res: Response) {
const { tokenId, address } = req.params;
- logger.debug(tokenId, address);
+ logger.debug({ tokenId, address }, 'Getting reputation score');
+
+ if (!tokenId || !address) {
+ throw new Error('Missing required parameters: tokenId and address');
+ }
+
const reputationScore = await nftService.getReputationScore(tokenId, address);
- res.send(reputationScore);
+
+ if (reputationScore === null || reputationScore === undefined) {
+ throw new Error('Failed to retrieve reputation score');
+ }
+
+ logger.debug({ reputationScore }, 'Retrieved reputation score');
+ res.json({ success: true, data: reputationScore });
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const reputationScore = await nftService.getReputationScore(tokenId, address); | |
| res.send(reputationScore); | |
| const getReputationScore = catchAsync(async function (req: Request, res: Response) { | |
| const { tokenId, address } = req.params; | |
| logger.debug({ tokenId, address }, 'Getting reputation score'); | |
| if (!tokenId || !address) { | |
| throw new Error('Missing required parameters: tokenId and address'); | |
| } | |
| const reputationScore = await nftService.getReputationScore(tokenId, address); | |
| if (reputationScore === null || reputationScore === undefined) { | |
| throw new Error('Failed to retrieve reputation score'); | |
| } | |
| logger.debug({ reputationScore }, 'Retrieved reputation score'); | |
| res.json({ success: true, data: reputationScore }); | |
| }); |
| return platform; | ||
| return { | ||
| reputationScore, | ||
| communintyId: dynamicNftModule?.id, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in property key 'communintyId'
The property key 'communintyId' in the return object is misspelled. It should be 'communityId'.
Apply this diff to correct the typo:
return {
reputationScore,
- communintyId: dynamicNftModule?.id,
+ communityId: dynamicNftModule?.id,
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| function buildReputationScoreQuery(profileId: string, platformId: string, memberLabel: string): string { | ||
| return ` | ||
| MATCH (:${memberLabel} {id: "${profileId}"})-[r:HAVE_METRICS {platformId: "${platformId}"}]->(a) | ||
| WITH r.date as metrics_date, r.closenessCentrality as memberScore | ||
| ORDER BY metrics_date DESC | ||
| LIMIT 1 | ||
| MATCH (user:${memberLabel})-[user_r:HAVE_METRICS {platformId: "${platformId}", date: metrics_date}]->(user) | ||
| WITH memberScore, MAX(user_r.closenessCentrality) as maxScore | ||
| RETURN memberScore / maxScore AS reputation_score | ||
| `; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Prevent potential Cypher injection by using parameterized queries
The buildReputationScoreQuery function constructs a Cypher query by directly interpolating profileId and platformId. This can lead to Cypher injection if these values are tampered with. Use parameterized queries to enhance security.
Refactor the code to use parameters:
-function buildReputationScoreQuery(profileId: string, platformId: string, memberLabel: string): string {
- return `
- MATCH (:${memberLabel} {id: "${profileId}"})-[r:HAVE_METRICS {platformId: "${platformId}"}]->(a)
+function buildReputationScoreQuery(memberLabel: string): string {
+ return `
+ MATCH (:${memberLabel} {id: $profileId})-[r:HAVE_METRICS {platformId: $platformId}]->(a)
WITH r.date as metrics_date, r.closenessCentrality as memberScore
ORDER BY metrics_date DESC
LIMIT 1
- MATCH (user:${memberLabel})-[user_r:HAVE_METRICS {platformId: "${platformId}", date: metrics_date}]->(user)
+ MATCH (user:${memberLabel})-[user_r:HAVE_METRICS {platformId: $platformId, date: metrics_date}]->(user)
WITH memberScore, MAX(user_r.closenessCentrality) as maxScore
RETURN memberScore / maxScore AS reputation_score
`;
}When executing the query, pass parameters separately:
async function calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile: any, platform: any): Promise<number> {
const platformName = platform.name as SupportedNeo4jPlatforms;
const memberLabel = NEO4J_PLATFORM_INFO[platformName].member;
const platformId = platform.id;
const profileId = profile.profile.id;
- const reputationScoreQuery = buildReputationScoreQuery(profileId, platformId, memberLabel);
- const neo4jData = await Neo4j.read(reputationScoreQuery);
+ const reputationScoreQuery = buildReputationScoreQuery(memberLabel);
+ const params = { profileId, platformId };
+ const neo4jData = await Neo4j.run(reputationScoreQuery, params);
return extractReputationScoreFromNeo4jData(neo4jData);
}Ensure your Neo4j driver supports parameterized queries.
| const chainProfiles = await ociService.getProfiles(address, supportedChainIds[i]); | ||
| profiles = profiles.concat(chainProfiles); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for OCI service calls
Exceptions from ociService.getProfiles could disrupt the entire process. Implement error handling to make the function more robust.
Example implementation:
for (let i = 0; i < supportedChainIds.length; i++) {
- const chainProfiles = await ociService.getProfiles(address, supportedChainIds[i]);
- profiles = profiles.concat(chainProfiles);
+ try {
+ const chainProfiles = await ociService.getProfiles(address, supportedChainIds[i]);
+ profiles = profiles.concat(chainProfiles);
+ } catch (error) {
+ logger.error(`Error fetching profiles for chain ID ${supportedChainIds[i]}: ${error.message}`);
+ // Optionally, handle the error or continue to the next iteration
+ }
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/services/nft.service.ts
Outdated
| let reputationScore = 0; | ||
| for (const profile of profiles) { | ||
| if (supportedPlatforms.includes(profile.profile.provider)) { | ||
| const platform = await platformService.getPlatformByFilter({ | ||
| name: profile.profile.provider, | ||
| community: dynamicNftModule?.community, | ||
| }); | ||
| if (platform) { | ||
| reputationScore = await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform); | ||
| logger.debug(`Reputation Score: ${reputationScore}`); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure correct accumulation of reputation scores from multiple profiles
Currently, the reputationScore variable is overwritten in each iteration of the loop. This means only the last calculated score is returned. If the intent is to accumulate or average the scores from all profiles, consider modifying the logic accordingly.
Here is how you can adjust the code to accumulate the reputation scores:
let reputationScore = 0;
+let profileCount = 0;
for (const profile of profiles) {
if (supportedPlatforms.includes(profile.profile.provider)) {
const platform = await platformService.getPlatformByFilter({
name: profile.profile.provider,
community: dynamicNftModule?.community,
});
if (platform) {
- reputationScore = await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform);
+ const score = await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform);
+ reputationScore += score;
+ profileCount++;
logger.debug(`Reputation Score: ${reputationScore}`);
}
}
}
+reputationScore = profileCount > 0 ? reputationScore / profileCount : 0;Adjust the accumulation logic based on whether you want a total sum or an average.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let reputationScore = 0; | |
| for (const profile of profiles) { | |
| if (supportedPlatforms.includes(profile.profile.provider)) { | |
| const platform = await platformService.getPlatformByFilter({ | |
| name: profile.profile.provider, | |
| community: dynamicNftModule?.community, | |
| }); | |
| if (platform) { | |
| reputationScore = await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform); | |
| logger.debug(`Reputation Score: ${reputationScore}`); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| let reputationScore = 0; | |
| let profileCount = 0; | |
| for (const profile of profiles) { | |
| if (supportedPlatforms.includes(profile.profile.provider)) { | |
| const platform = await platformService.getPlatformByFilter({ | |
| name: profile.profile.provider, | |
| community: dynamicNftModule?.community, | |
| }); | |
| if (platform) { | |
| const score = await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform); | |
| reputationScore += score; | |
| profileCount++; | |
| logger.debug(`Reputation Score: ${reputationScore}`); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| reputationScore = profileCount > 0 ? reputationScore / profileCount : 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/services/nft.service.ts (1)
60-70: Improve type safety with proper interfacesThe code uses
anytypes which could lead to runtime errors. Consider defining proper interfaces for the profile and Neo4j response types.Add these interfaces:
interface Profile { profile: { id: string; provider: PlatformNames; }; } interface Neo4jResponse { records: Array<{ get(key: string): number; }>; } // Then update the function signatures: async function calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile: Profile, platform: IPlatform): Promise<number> function extractReputationScoreFromNeo4jData(neo4jData: Neo4jResponse): numberAlso applies to: 84-96
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/services/nft.service.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/services/nft.service.ts (3)
46-46:
Fix typo in property key 'communintyId'
The property key has a spelling error.
72-82:
Security: Use parameterized queries to prevent Cypher injection
The current implementation is vulnerable to Cypher injection attacks through string interpolation.
22-47: Verify error handling coverage
Let's verify that all error cases are properly handled.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Error handling is properly implemented
The code has appropriate error handling for the key operations:
throwErrorIfUserHasNoOnChainProfilesthrows ApiError(400) if user has no profilesthrowErrorIfDynamicNftModuleDoesNotExistthrows ApiError(400) if module not found- Service method calls like
moduleService.getModuleByFilter()andplatformService.getPlatformByFilter()have error handling in their implementations
The error cases are well covered through:
- Input validation errors (400)
- Not found errors (404)
- Service-specific errors (590)
- Internal server errors (500)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential error cases that might not be handled
rg -n "throw.*ApiError" src/
rg -n "catch" src/
# Search for service method calls that might throw errors
ast-grep --pattern 'await $service.$method($$$)'
Length of output: 19895
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| async function getProfiles(address: string) { | ||
| let profiles: Array<any> = []; | ||
| const supportedChainIds = [11155111]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move chain ID to configuration
The supported chain ID is hard-coded. This should be moved to a configuration file for better maintainability.
Create a config file and move the chain IDs there:
// src/config/blockchain.config.ts
export const SUPPORTED_CHAIN_IDS = {
SEPOLIA: 11155111,
// Add other chains as needed
};| community: dynamicNftModule?.community, | ||
| }); | ||
| if (platform) { | ||
| reputationScore = (await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform)) + reputationScore; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix reputation score calculation logic
The current implementation adds reputation scores together without averaging, which could lead to inflated scores for users with multiple profiles.
Apply this fix:
- reputationScore = (await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform)) + reputationScore;
+ const profileScore = await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform);
+ reputationScore = Math.max(reputationScore, profileScore); // Take highest score across platforms📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| reputationScore = (await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform)) + reputationScore; | |
| const profileScore = await calculateReputationScoreForProfile(profile, platform); | |
| reputationScore = Math.max(reputationScore, profileScore); // Take highest score across platforms |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes