Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add depending .d.ts files as changed when watch is triggered #698

Merged

Conversation

KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor

If a project depends on custom definition files, meaning not the ones in node_modules, then it should consider them changed when webpack triggers a watch-run.
Since webpack doesn't know about definition files, we use the one detected by the languageService which should be more accurate anyway.

Closes #697

If a project depends on custom definition files, meaning not the ones in node_modules, then it should consider them changed when webpack triggers a watch-run.
Since webpack doesn't know about definition files, we use the one detected by the languageService which should be more accurate anyway.

Closes TypeStrong#697
@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

Thanks @KnisterPeter - I'm pretty snowed right now but I will get back to you with a review once things ease off.

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@johnnyreilly any update on this?

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

Hi @KnisterPeter,

Thanks for the PR - it hasn't been forgotten. I'm taking some time out over Christmas and I'm planning to take a look at it once #685 has been merged. Typically we have a much faster turnaround on PRs but on this occasion there is going to be a lag as 685 is so significant. Essentially I'm trying to avoid merge hell 😉

Please bear with me - I will get to this PR as soon as I can. Thanks again for contributing - I really appreciate it.

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've just resolved the conflicts. Before merging I'll test if the new watcher code is enough without my PR.

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

After testing with the current master, I have to say that my PR is still needed to rebuild when only declaration files change.
So it would be cool if you could review and merge my changes.

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

Cheers @KnisterPeter

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

You tested with experimentalWatchApi: true?

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

A sorry, I missed that. I'll test again 😄

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

KnisterPeter commented Jan 24, 2018

@johnnyreilly Nope, even with that its still missing files (or at least not reporting errors).
To be more precise, webpack does not report errors if a definition file change but it rebuilds all dependencies.
This may be the errors in the current new watch impl.

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

👍

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

Hey @KnisterPeter,

It looks like the declarationWatch test is broken by this (which may make sense given the nature of the change). Can you advise on how you would expect this test case to behave post your change?

Test in question here: https://github.com/TypeStrong/ts-loader/tree/master/test/comparison-tests/declarationWatch

Explanation of our comparison test pack here: https://github.com/TypeStrong/ts-loader/blob/master/test/comparison-tests/README.md

Happy to help if there's confusion.

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@johnnyreilly I could try to fix the test the next days.
From what I expect by my change is that if there are declarations part of the current program (as dependency) and there are changes in them, a build should be triggered.

This is for example helpful if you have a project with yarn workspaces, lerna or other cases (like in the example repo created by me).
If interfaces are changed this will only result in changed declaration files which should rebuild depending projects.

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

Ok - hopefully you should be able to just regenerate the output of the test. Assuming it looks sane then we're good from a functional perspective.

Question: do you know what sort of impact this change has on performance?

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

KnisterPeter commented Jan 28, 2018

@johnnyreilly Thats a bit strange. When running locally with yarn comparison-tests all tests run successfully. Any idea what could go wrong on travis?

Oh, i see, its just the TSC 2.7-rc builds. But event stranger I did run them with 2.7-rc locally as well.

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Regarding the performance it should have no or low impact. This change just add watchers for the included definition files.

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@johnnyreilly Any idea?

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

Sorry about the delay in responding @KnisterPeter - I've been very occupied with webpack 4 work.

Could you delete the 2.7 expected output for the failing test and then regenerate it using --save-output please? I have a feeling it may be a "stale files" issue you're facing.

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@johnnyreilly Done. Thumbs pressed 😃

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@johnnyreilly All done. Thanks for your help.

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

No bother. Question: how keen are you for this to use this with webpack 3? I'm planning to release ts-loader 4 with webpack 4 support. It'd make my life easier if I included this with that. However if you're unlikely to be able to move to webpack 4 soon after release then let me know. It's probably still doable to ship another ts-loader on the v3 codebase

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would be very glad if it will be merged for webpack 3. I'm not sure how fast we could move on to webpack 4.

@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

OK - I'll see what I can do.

@johnnyreilly johnnyreilly merged commit b67e587 into TypeStrong:master Jan 30, 2018
@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

Released as https://github.com/TypeStrong/ts-loader/releases/tag/v3.4.0 - thanks for your help!

@KnisterPeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wow. Thank you 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants