-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Birdnet integration #112
Birdnet integration #112
Conversation
Added BirdNet Pipeline
- Upgrades to tensorflow 2.8.0 which is compatible with both Microfaune and BirdNET
birdnet "model" isolation parameter was mispelled as "birndet"
…into birdnet_integration
Updated example to include the "model" isolation parameter
currently calls generate_automated_labels on the single clip - will refactor in a different commit to handle if an already made automated_df is passed in
- Made sure it is in the conda_environments folder
- Changed local_score_visualization() to spectrogram_visualization() - Changed plot_bird_label_scores() to binary_visualization() - Fixed a small bug in spectrogram_visualization() related to an error warning when a dataframe with automated annotations from multiple clips is passed in
- Fixed a small bug in spectrogram_visualization() to better handle both bools and dataframes for automated_df - Added spectrogram_graph(), annotation_duration_histogram() to README
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Found a bug in how the automated_df parameter was typechecked. Everything else worked fine. Further RIP to Normalized_Sample_Rate 😊
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are a couple of things that I noticed
- The BirdNet README needs to be updated with the new argument that we added.
- The color codes look confusing for this cell when using BirdNet isolation parameters
The markdown cell mentions white for true negatives, but the spectrogram shows blue
Apart from these, the changes look good to me!
Shreyas, when you say argument added, which function are you referring to? |
I am referring to the 'num_predictions' command line argument |
Cool, just changed our repo |
- Some markdown didn't make sense talking about TPs, FPs, FNs, and TNs in the context of the spectrogram_visualization() changes
…into birdnet_integration
No description provided.