Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Low Oil consumption - OIL - NorthWestern Corporation #124

Closed
m-jamieson opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Low Oil consumption - OIL - NorthWestern Corporation #124

m-jamieson opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@m-jamieson
Copy link
Collaborator

There is a large amount of electricity generated with petroleum coke at one of the "oil" plants in this BA. This is another issue that may go away with the proposed fix for #77. At least it would be correctly labeled as a "COKE" plant, if such a thing existed.
@m-jamieson m-jamieson mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2020
Closed
m-jamieson added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2020
@m-jamieson
Merge pull request #137 from /issues/124
f825486 
adding RFO as proxy for petcoke
@m-jamieson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This issue did not go away. We mapped pet coke plants as "OIL" plants for FuelCategory, but then didn't have a fuel profile for it. After implementing the proxy, only NorthWestern and PJM "OIL" plants had significant increases in total petroleum product consumption. This brings them much more inline with the other oil plants.

@m-jamieson m-jamieson mentioned this issue Aug 4, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@m-jamieson