Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: flexible-rollout random stickiness is not random enough #417

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2023

Conversation

ivarconr
Copy link
Member

It's easy to get skew when we only pick numbers between 0 and 100.

It's easy to get skew when we only pick numbers between 0 and 100.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 17, 2023

Coverage Status

Coverage: 92.01%. Remained the same when pulling a4a9d47 on fix/random-must-be-random into e4c2963 on main.

Copy link

@gardleopard gardleopard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. better with random than radnom as well:D

@ivarconr ivarconr merged commit cc5b40e into main Jan 17, 2023
@ivarconr ivarconr deleted the fix/random-must-be-random branch January 17, 2023 21:10
thomasheartman added a commit to Unleash/unleash-client-go that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Relates to a related fix done in some other sdks, such as the node one at
Unleash/unleash-client-node#417

In this case, this method appears unused, so we can remove it.
thomasheartman added a commit to Unleash/unleash-client-go that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024

Relates to a related fix done in some other sdks, such as the node one at
Unleash/unleash-client-node#417

In this case, the comment was misleading, so we can edit it.
thomasheartman added a commit to Unleash/unleash-client-ruby that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
… stickiness id (#200)



Same fix as done in some other sdks, such as the node one at
Unleash/unleash-client-node#417

Fixes an issue where 1% rollout would not yield any results with
random rollout for certain group ids
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants