Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

extensions MENTZ TimedLeg and ExchangePoint #244

Merged
merged 45 commits into from
Jan 20, 2023

Conversation

ue71603
Copy link
Contributor

@ue71603 ue71603 commented Sep 16, 2022

ServiceTrainNameExtension ==> added ServiceGroup/TrainName
ServiceTrainNumberExtension ==> not done. TrainNumber exists in TimedLeg ServiceGroup/TrainNumber
ServiceOperatorNameExtension ==> added ServiceGroup/OperatorName
TrackSectionExtension ==> not needed any more (is solved in #263)
ExchangePointWaitingTimeExtension ==> not done. WaitTime exists. Otherwise an explanation is needed, why this is not enough (ExchangePointsResultStructure/WaitTime)
ExchangePointPriorityExtension ==> added ExchangePointsResultStructure/Priority

@ue71603 ue71603 added enhancement New feature or request documentation labels Sep 16, 2022
@ue71603 ue71603 added this to the v2.0 milestone Sep 16, 2022
OJP/OJP_Common.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Places.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Places.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@herlitze
Copy link
Contributor

TrackSectionExtension: EFA-XML-Format is able to provide georeferences, since EFA-XML-Format is requested of active system, the active system needs to get this information from the passives systems via OJP. This is not needed in OJP standard, since it is a workaround for existing layouts.

OJP/OJP_FareSupport.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_JourneySupport.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_JourneySupport.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Common.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Common.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Common.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_JourneySupport.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Places.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Places.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Trips.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ue71603 ue71603 requested review from skinkie and Aurige October 27, 2022 13:23
OJP/OJP_Common.xsd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
OJP/OJP_Trips.xsd Show resolved Hide resolved
skinkie
skinkie previously approved these changes Nov 24, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@skinkie skinkie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally: I think this is... "too woke".

@ue71603 ue71603 force-pushed the Incorporating_EU_Spirit_LinkingAls_etc branch from 18bb0d2 to e741863 Compare December 17, 2022 11:21
Aurige
Aurige previously approved these changes Jan 10, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Aurige Aurige left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Multiple topics in the same PR but Ok

@ue71603 ue71603 force-pushed the Incorporating_EU_Spirit_LinkingAls_etc branch from 4da0a8d to 27d520f Compare January 20, 2023 09:34
Copy link

@AndreasAtSBB AndreasAtSBB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes OK.

@skinkie skinkie merged commit 631a256 into changes_for_v1.1 Jan 20, 2023
@skinkie skinkie deleted the Incorporating_EU_Spirit_LinkingAls_etc branch January 20, 2023 10:48
@@ -364,7 +369,7 @@
<xs:documentation>Rough estimate of the travel duration from the specified reference place to this exchange point.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="WaitDuration" type="xs:duration" default="PT0M" minOccurs="0">
<xs:element name="WaitDuration" type="xs:duration" minOccurs="0" default="PT0M">
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really dislike this merge frenzy without approval from several people.
This merge reverted #286 again.
Why?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc updated enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants