-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for topologySpreadConstraints #107
Comments
* adds topologySpreadConstraints to CRD objects, added e2e test recover #107 * Removed uneeded file
I tried the update #110 . Because the VMCluster CRD becomes much larger, it now hit the problem stated at kubernetes/kubectl#712 .
This problem can be avoided by using server-side apply and the procedure written in quick-start.MD might be updated to use The operator itself seems to be working as expected. Thank you. |
Ahhh, get it. Its a common issue with huge crd objects, i'll fix it soon. But in general need to think about some marker at kubernetes controller-gen, that will skip schema generation for embedded resources. |
I tested v0.5.0. It seems to work fine. Thank you. |
I want support for topologySpreadConstraints in CRs that deploy pods. It makes pod scheduling more flexible.
It is already supported in Prometheus Operator.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: