Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add more combinators to Output - issue #466 #467

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

lbialy
Copy link
Collaborator

@lbialy lbialy commented Apr 18, 2024

some discussion regarding destructuring in for-comprehensions is still to be had @pawelprazak

@lbialy lbialy added this to the 0.3.1 milestone Apr 18, 2024
@lbialy lbialy requested a review from pawelprazak April 18, 2024 19:03
Copy link
Contributor

@pawelprazak pawelprazak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thank you.

@lbialy lbialy merged commit f91c2fa into main Apr 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@lbialy lbialy deleted the lbialy/more-combinators-for-output branch April 19, 2024 12:42
@pawelprazak pawelprazak added area/core The SDK's core code impact/usability Something that impacts users' ability to use the product easily and intuitively kind/improvement An improvement with existing workaround labels Apr 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/core The SDK's core code impact/usability Something that impacts users' ability to use the product easily and intuitively kind/improvement An improvement with existing workaround
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants