Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: calendar key #357

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

test: calendar key #357

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2024

Conversation

TobiTenno
Copy link
Member

@TobiTenno TobiTenno commented Dec 22, 2024

Summary


Resolves issue
fix test after new worldstate entry


Screenshots/examples

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated test specifications to include a new 'calendar' key in the data object assertions.

@TobiTenno TobiTenno requested a review from a team as a code owner December 22, 2024 18:21
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor modification to the test specification for accessing world state data. A new key, 'calendar', has been added to the existing assertion that checks the structure of the data object returned by the ws.getWorldstate() method. This change ensures that the test validates the presence of the 'calendar' key alongside other previously defined keys, expanding the test's coverage of the world state object's structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
test/specs/access.spec.js Added 'calendar' key to the object key assertion for world state data object

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's test of worldly might,
New 'calendar' key now shines so bright!
Assertions dance with added grace,
Checking data with playful embrace
Code hops forward, one key at a time! 🗓️

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 42cd909 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea7e90e and 42cd909.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/specs/access.spec.js (1 hunks)

test/specs/access.spec.js Show resolved Hide resolved
@TobiTenno TobiTenno changed the title ci: calendar key test: calendar key Dec 22, 2024
@TobiTenno TobiTenno merged commit e72f884 into master Dec 22, 2024
12 checks passed
@TobiTenno TobiTenno deleted the fix-test branch December 22, 2024 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants