Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add introduction section to the IsolatedContext spec #40

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

robbiemc
Copy link
Collaborator

@robbiemc robbiemc commented Jul 12, 2024

This fleshes out the spec's introduction section a bit and fixes the Isolated Context definition.

In the future more non-normative text is planned that elaborates more on motivation, design decisions, and expected usage.


Preview | Diff

@robbiemc robbiemc requested a review from reillyeon July 12, 2024 00:04
Copy link
Collaborator

@reillyeon reillyeon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a capitalization nit.


This is a monkey patch specification that makes the following modifications:
[=Isolated Contexts=] define a minimum standard of isolation and integrity for
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[=Isolated Contexts=] define a minimum standard of isolation and integrity for
[=Isolated contexts=] define a minimum standard of isolation and integrity for

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@robbiemc robbiemc merged commit e86e607 into WICG:main Jul 12, 2024
2 checks passed
@robbiemc robbiemc deleted the polish branch July 12, 2024 00:18
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
SHA: e86e607
Reason: push, by robbiemc

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants