Merge pull request #161 from amirrr/RMET-short

Reading the Mind in the Eyes test (RMET)

package.json

@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
 {
   "name": "@watts-lab/surveys",
-  "version": "1.10.0",
+  "version": "1.11.0",
   "description": "",
   "main": "dist/index.js",
   "module": "dist/index.js",
   "scripts": {
     "prebuild": "node computeSha.js && node builder.js",
     "build": "npx rollup --config",
     "test": "npx cypress open"
+
   },
   "repository": {
     "type": "git",

src/index.js

@@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ import relatednessNeedSatisfactionSha from "../surveys/relatednessNeedSatisfacti
 import { default as relatednessNeedSatisfactionScoreFunc } from "../surveys/relatednessNeedSatisfaction/relatednessNeedSatisfaction.score.js";
 export const RelatednessNeedSatisfaction = SurveyFactory("relatednessNeedSatisfaction", relatednessNeedSatisfactionJson, relatednessNeedSatisfactionScoreFunc, relatednessNeedSatisfactionSha);
 
+import rmeTenJson from "../surveys/rmeTen/rmeTen.json";
+import rmeTenSha from "../surveys/rmeTen/sha.json";
+import { default as rmeTenScoreFunc } from "../surveys/rmeTen/rmeTen.score.js";
+export const RmeTen = SurveyFactory("rmeTen", rmeTenJson, rmeTenScoreFunc, rmeTenSha);
+
 import SVIJson from "../surveys/SVI/SVI.json";
 import SVISha from "../surveys/SVI/sha.json";
 import { default as SVIScoreFunc } from "../surveys/SVI/SVI.score.js";

surveys/rmeTen/references.bib

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+@article{Chander2020,
+  title = {Development of a short-form version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test for assessing theory of mind in older adults},
+  author = {Chander, Russell J and Grainger, Sarah A and Crawford, John D and Mather, Karen A and Numbers, Katya and Cleary, Rhiagh and Kochan, Nicole A and Brodaty, Henry and Henry, Julie D and Sachdev, Perminder S},
+  journal = {International journal of geriatric psychiatry},
+  year = {2020},
+  volume = {35},
+  number = {11},
+  pages = {1322-1330},
+  month = {Nov},
+  doi = {10.1002/gps.5369},
+  issn = {1099-1166 (Electronic), 0885-6230 (Linking)},
+  pmid = {32584445},
+  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5369},
+  abstract = {BACKGROUND: The Reading the Mind in the Eyes test (RMET) is a 36-item assessment for theory of mind (ToM) performance. While this measure has been shown to be sensitive to age-related ToM difficulties, there are no established cutoffs or guidelines currently available that are specific to older adults. This article seeks to validate a short-form version of the RMET appropriate for use in such populations. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 295 participants (mean age 86 years) from the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study, a longitudinal community observational cohort. Participants underwent an assessment battery that included the RMET. Individuals who scored >1SD below the RMET scores of cognitively normal participants were deemed to have below average RMET scores. Various model-building methods were used to generate short-form solutions of the RMET, which were compared with previously validated versions in their predictive power for below average full RMET performance. RESULTS: Individuals with below average RMET performance tended to be older and have poorer global cognition. Of the eight short-form solutions, the 21-item version generated using genetic algorithm exhibited the best classification performance with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.98 and had 93.2% accuracy in classifying individuals with below average ToM. A shorter 10-item solution derived by ant colony optimization also had acceptable performance. CONCLUSION: We recommend the 21-item version of the RMET for use in older adult populations for identifying individuals with impaired ToM. Where an even shorter version is needed with a trade-off of slightly reduced performance, the 10-item version is acceptable.},
+  keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Memory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Theory of Mind},
+  note = {CI - © 2020 John Wiley \& Sons Ltd.},
+  affiliation = {Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CheBA), School Of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia.},
+  orcid = {0000-0002-2110-5958, 0000-0001-9487-6617, 0000-0002-9595-3220},
+}

surveys/rmeTen/rmeTen.cy.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+import React from "react";
+import { RmeTen } from "../../src/index";
+
+const surveyJsonPath = "surveys/rmeTen/rmeTen.json";
+
+// Initialize an empty answers object
+const answers = {};
+
+const dummy = {
+  set(response) {},
+};
+
+describe("RMETTen", () => {
+  it("completes the survey", () => {
+    cy.spy(dummy, "set").as("callback");
+    cy.mount(<RmeTen onComplete={dummy.set} />);
+    cy.viewport("macbook-11");
+
+    cy.readFile(surveyJsonPath).then((surveyJson) => {
+      // Build the answers object by assuming each question's answer is the first choice
+      surveyJson.pages.forEach((page) => {
+        page.elements.forEach((element) => {
+          if (element.type === "radiogroup") {
+            answers[element.name] = element.choices[0];
+          }
+        });
+      });
+
+      // Now iterate over pages to perform the survey
+      surveyJson.pages.forEach((page, pageIndex) => {
+        page.elements.forEach((element) => {
+          if (element.type === "image") {
+            // Verify the image is present
+            cy.get("img").should("have.attr", "src", element.imageLink);
+          } else if (element.type === "radiogroup") {
+            // Click the radio button corresponding to the question
+            const answerValue = answers[element.name];
+            cy.get(
+              `[data-name="${element.name}"] input[value="${answerValue}"]`
+            ).click({ force: true });
+          }
+        });
+
+        cy.screenshot(`rmeTen/screenshot_${pageIndex}`, {
+          overwrite: true,
+        });
+
+        // Click "Next" button if not on the last page
+        if (pageIndex < surveyJson.pages.length - 1) {
+          cy.get('input[type="button"][value="Next"]').click({ force: true });
+        }
+      });
+
+      cy.screenshot("rmetTen/screenshot", {
+        overwrite: true,
+      });
+
+      cy.get("form") // submit surveyJS form
+        .then(($form) => {
+          cy.wrap($form.find('input[type="button"][value="Complete"]')).click();
+        });
+
+      cy.get(".sv-body").should("not.exist");
+
+      cy.get("@callback").should("have.been.called");
+      cy.get("@callback").then((spy) => {
+        const spyCall = spy.getCall(-1).args[0];
+        console.log(spyCall);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});

surveys/rmeTen/rmeTen.score.js

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// No postprocessing needed for this survey
+// Item 4: Insisting
+// Item 6: Fantasizing
+// Item 11: Regretful
+// Item 15: Contemplative
+// Item 17: Doubtful
+// Item 22: Preoccupied
+// Item 24: Pensive
+// Item 27: Cautious
+// Item 28: Interested
+// Item 29: Reflective
+
+const answers = {
+  question1: "insisting",
+  question2: "fantasizing",
+  question3: "regretful",
+  question4: "contemplative",
+  question5: "doubtful",
+  question6: "preoccupied",
+  question7: "pensive",
+  question8: "cautious",
+  question9: "interested",
+  question10: "reflective",
+};
+
+export default function scoreFunc(responses) {
+  let score = 0;
+
+  Object.keys(answers).forEach((questionName) => {
+    const response = responses[questionName];
+    const answer = answers[questionName];
+
+    if (response === answer) {
+      score += 1;
+    }
+  });
+
+  return { score: score, maxScore: 10, minScore: 0, responses: responses };
+}

surveys/rmeTen/sha.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"survey":"a877564008c8a997f270e2b19d813a5fb516c406","score":"ba0f44e4945160b5327df9edc7bd5f840443f951"}

surveys/teamViability/teamViability.cy.jsx

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ describe("TeamViability", () => {
   it("completes", () => {
     cy.spy(dummy, "set").as("callback");
     cy.mount(<TeamViability onComplete={dummy.set} />);
-    cy.viewport('macbook-11');
+    cy.viewport("macbook-11");
 
     cy.get('[data-name="capableUnit"] input[value="2"]').click({
       force: true,