Update Judgeme reviews design when review not found #217
Conversation
…m handling with conditional rendering in review index
WalkthroughThe changes include modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
…rove readability and maintainability
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-list.tsx (5)
8-8: Remove unnecessary empty line.
Consider removing the empty line after the component declaration to maintain consistent code style.
export function ReviewList({judgemeReviews}: {judgemeReviews: JudgemeReviewsData}) {
-
const pageNumber = Math.ceil(judgemeReviews.reviews.length / reviewPerPage);Line range hint 29-44: Fix React key prop placement and Fragment usage.
There are several issues in the review rendering logic:
- The
keyprop is incorrectly placed on the inner div instead of the Fragment - Using Fragment without a key in a map function can cause React reconciliation issues
Apply this fix:
- <>
- <div key={index} className="flex gap-4 flex-col md:flex-row">
+ <Fragment key={index}>
+ <div className="flex gap-4 flex-col md:flex-row">
<div className="flex flex-col gap-4 md:w-1/4 w-full">
{/* ... */}
</div>
<div className="md:w-3/4 w-full flex flex-col gap-4">
{/* ... */}
</div>
</div>
<hr className="border-t border-gray-300" />
- </>
+ </Fragment>Don't forget to import Fragment:
-import { useState } from "react";
+import { Fragment, useState } from "react";Line range hint 42-42: Fix inconsistent className spacing.
Remove the extra space at the start of the className.
- <p className=" font-normal text-base line-clamp-4">{review.body}</p>
+ <p className="font-normal text-base line-clamp-4">{review.body}</p>Line range hint 15-18: Consider making date locale configurable.
The date formatting function uses a hardcoded "en-GB" locale. Consider making this configurable to support internationalization.
- const formatDate = (dateString: string) => {
- const date = new Date(dateString);
- return date.toLocaleDateString("en-GB");
+ const formatDate = (dateString: string, locale = 'en-GB') => {
+ const date = new Date(dateString);
+ return date.toLocaleDateString(locale);
};Line range hint 7-71: Consider adding error boundaries and loading states.
The component could benefit from error handling and loading states to improve user experience when:
- Reviews data is loading
- An error occurs while rendering reviews
Consider wrapping the component with an error boundary and adding loading states. Would you like me to provide an example implementation?
app/lib/judgeme.ts (1)
Line range hint 47-86: Consider enhancing error handling in getJudgemeReviews.
While the function handles the case of missing API token, it could benefit from more robust error handling:
- Validate shop_domain and handle
- Add try-catch block for API calls
- Handle potential type mismatches in the response
Consider applying these improvements:
export let getJudgemeReviews = async (
api_token: string,
shop_domain: string,
handle: string,
weaverse: WeaverseClient
) => {
const defaultData = {
rating: 0,
reviewNumber: 0,
reviews: [],
};
- if (!api_token) {
+ if (!api_token || !shop_domain || !handle) {
return defaultData;
}
+ try {
let internalId = await getInternalIdByHandle(
api_token,
shop_domain,
handle,
weaverse
);
if (internalId) {
let data = (await weaverse.fetchWithCache(
`https://judge.me/api/v1/reviews?${new URLSearchParams({
api_token,
shop_domain,
product_id: internalId,
})}`
)) as JudgemeReviewsData;
+ if (!Array.isArray(data?.reviews)) {
+ console.error('Invalid response format from JudgeMe API');
+ return defaultData;
+ }
let reviews = data.reviews;
let rating =
reviews.reduce((acc, review) => acc + review.rating, 0) /
(reviews.length || 1);
return {
rating,
reviewNumber: reviews.length,
reviews,
};
}
return defaultData;
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Error fetching JudgeMe reviews:', error);
+ return defaultData;
+ }
};📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- app/lib/judgeme.ts (1 hunks)
- app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-form.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-index.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-list.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-index.tsx (2)
5-6: LGTM: Import statements are properly organized.
The new imports are correctly placed and necessary for the added functionality.
11-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for the loader data.
While the type assertion is correct, it would be safer to add error handling for cases where the loader data might be undefined or when judgemeReviews is not available.
Let's verify the loader implementation:
Consider adding a null check:
- const { judgemeReviews } = useLoaderData<ProductLoaderType>();
+ const data = useLoaderData<ProductLoaderType>();
+ const judgemeReviews = data?.judgemeReviews;
+ if (!judgemeReviews) {
+ return null; // or a fallback UI
+ }app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-list.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate.
The addition of the JudgemeReviewsData type import supports proper TypeScript type checking for the component's props.
7-7: LGTM: Component signature update improves reusability.
The change to accept judgemeReviews as a prop makes the component more modular and easier to test.
app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-form.tsx (9)
9-13: LGTM!
The updated function signature correctly accepts the judgemeReviews prop of type JudgemeReviewsData. This change aligns with the modifications made in the ReviewIndex component.
58-60: LGTM!
The review count is now correctly displayed using the reviewNumber property from the judgemeReviews prop.
62-75: LGTM!
The component now conditionally renders the rating display based on the presence of the rating property in the judgemeReviews prop. When there are no reviews, an appropriate message is displayed to encourage users to provide a review.
77-83: LGTM!
The "Write a Review" button is correctly disabled when the form or popup is visible, preventing multiple form instances from being opened simultaneously.
87-95: LGTM!
The form container is conditionally styled based on the presence of reviews, ensuring proper alignment and width when there are no reviews.
98-104: LGTM!
The review form heading is conditionally centered when there are no reviews, improving the visual presentation in that scenario.
131-220: LGTM!
The review form structure and functionality remain intact, with the form submission handled correctly using the fetcher and handleSubmit function.
225-230: LGTM!
The review submission confirmation popup is conditionally styled based on the presence of reviews, ensuring proper alignment of the "Close" button.
47-57: Verify the conditional rendering logic.
The changes introduce conditional rendering based on the presence of reviews. Ensure that the layout and visibility of elements are as intended when there are no reviews.
Run the following script to verify the conditional rendering:
✅ Verification successful
Conditional rendering logic is correctly implemented
The search results confirm that the conditional rendering logic is properly implemented with consistent behavior:
-
When there are no reviews (
reviews.length === 0):- Main container uses centered layout (
items-center) - Form container has specific width classes (
lg:w-1/3 md:w-2/5) - Text elements are centered (
text-center) - Success popup is centered with centered button
- Main container uses centered layout (
-
When there are reviews:
- Main container uses left-aligned layout (
items-start) - Container takes up appropriate width (
lg:w-1/3 md:w-2/5) - Text elements are left-aligned
- Success popup button is right-aligned
- Main container uses left-aligned layout (
The implementation ensures proper layout and visibility in both scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the conditional rendering logic in the ReviewForm component.
# Test 1: Search for the rendering logic when there are no reviews.
# Expect: Elements with "items-center" class.
rg -A 5 $'judgemeReviews.reviews.length === 0 \? "items-center"'
# Test 2: Search for the rendering logic when there are reviews.
# Expect: Elements with "items-start" class.
rg -A 5 $'judgemeReviews.reviews.length === 0 \? "" : "items-start"'
Length of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more flexible search pattern to find the conditional rendering logic
# Search for conditional rendering based on reviews length
rg -A 10 "reviews\.length === 0" app/sections/judgeme-reviews/
# Search for className with items-center or items-start
rg -B 5 -A 5 'className=.*items-(center|start)' app/sections/judgeme-reviews/
# Look for the entire ReviewForm component structure
ast-grep --pattern 'export function ReviewForm() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 10183
| <ReviewForm judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/> | ||
| {judgemeReviews.reviews.length > 0 && ( | ||
| <ReviewList judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/> | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety in the conditional rendering.
While the conditional rendering works, it assumes judgemeReviews.reviews is always defined. Consider adding a safer check to handle potential undefined values.
Consider this safer approach:
- <ReviewForm judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/>
- {judgemeReviews.reviews.length > 0 && (
+ <ReviewForm judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/>
+ {judgemeReviews.reviews?.length > 0 && (
<ReviewList judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/>
)}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <ReviewForm judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/> | |
| {judgemeReviews.reviews.length > 0 && ( | |
| <ReviewList judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/> | |
| )} | |
| <ReviewForm judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/> | |
| {judgemeReviews.reviews?.length > 0 && ( | |
| <ReviewList judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/> | |
| )} |
app/lib/judgeme.ts
Outdated
| export type JudgemeReviewsData = { | ||
| rating: number; | ||
| reviewNumber: number; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Type duplication detected in product form module
The JudgemeReviewsData type is duplicated in app/modules/product-form/judgeme-review.tsx with the same structure as the exported type from app/lib/judgeme.ts. This should be imported from the lib module instead of being redefined.
app/modules/product-form/judgeme-review.tsx: Replace the local type definition with an import ofJudgemeReviewsDatafrom~/lib/judgeme
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Well-structured type definition.
The exported JudgemeReviewsData type is well-defined with appropriate properties for rating aggregation and review counting. This change improves type safety and makes the review data structure more accessible to other components.
Let's verify the usage of this type across the codebase:
Let me analyze the usage of JudgemeReviewsData further by checking the implementation in the product form module since it appears to redefine the type:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of JudgemeReviewsData type
# Expected: Find imports and usages in review-related components
# Search for imports of JudgemeReviewsData
echo "Checking imports of JudgemeReviewsData:"
rg "import.*JudgemeReviewsData.*from.*judgeme"
# Search for type usage
echo -e "\nChecking usage of JudgemeReviewsData:"
rg "JudgemeReviewsData"
Length of output: 1228
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation in product form module
echo "Content of judgeme-review.tsx:"
cat app/modules/product-form/judgeme-review.tsx
Length of output: 1939
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-list.tsx (2)
Line range hint 28-45: Add key prop to fragment and improve accessibility
The review items mapping has a few issues:
- The fragment (
<>) wrapping each review item is missing a key prop - The review content could benefit from ARIA labels for better accessibility
Apply these improvements:
- <>
+ <React.Fragment key={index}>
<div key={index} className="flex gap-4 flex-col md:flex-row">
<div className="flex flex-col gap-4 md:w-1/4 w-full">
- <div className="flex items-center gap-0.5">
+ <div className="flex items-center gap-0.5" role="complementary" aria-label="Review rating">
<StarRating rating={review.rating} />
</div>
- <div className="flex flex-col">
+ <div className="flex flex-col" role="complementary" aria-label="Reviewer information">
<p className="font-semibold">{review.reviewer.name}</p>
<p>{review.reviewer.email}</p>
</div>
</div>
- <div className="md:w-3/4 w-full flex flex-col gap-4">
+ <div className="md:w-3/4 w-full flex flex-col gap-4" role="article" aria-label="Review content">
<div className="flex justify-between items-center">
<p className="font-bold">{review.title}</p>
<p>{formatDate(review.created_at)}</p>
</div>
<p className=" font-normal text-base line-clamp-4">{review.body}</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr className="border-t border-gray-300" />
- </>
+ </React.Fragment>Line range hint 47-63: Consider extracting pagination component
The pagination implementation could be extracted into a reusable component to improve maintainability and reusability.
Consider creating a separate Pagination component:
type PaginationProps = {
pageCount: number;
currentPage: number;
onPageChange: (page: number) => void;
};
function Pagination({ pageCount, currentPage, onPageChange }: PaginationProps) {
if (pageCount <= 1) return null;
return (
<div className="flex justify-center gap-2">
{Array.from({ length: pageCount }, (_, i) => (
<button
key={i}
onClick={() => onPageChange(i)}
className="bg-gray-200 text-gray-800 px-4 py-2 rounded-md hover:bg-gray-300 transition-colors duration-200 disabled:opacity-50 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:bg-black disabled:text-white"
disabled={i === currentPage}
aria-label={`Go to page ${i + 1}`}
aria-current={i === currentPage ? 'page' : undefined}
>
{i + 1}
</button>
))}
</div>
);
}Then use it in the ReviewList:
- {pageNumber > 1 && (
- <div className="flex justify-center gap-2">
- {Array.from({ length: pageNumber }, (_, i) => (
- <button
- key={i}
- onClick={() => setPage(i)}
- className="bg-gray-200 text-gray-800 px-4 py-2 rounded-md hover:bg-gray-300 transition-colors duration-200 disabled:opacity-50 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:bg-black disabled:text-white"
- disabled={i === page}
- >
- {i + 1}
- </button>
- ))}
- </div>
- )}
+ <Pagination
+ pageCount={pageNumber}
+ currentPage={page}
+ onPageChange={setPage}
+ />app/lib/judgeme.ts (1)
Line range hint 52-77: Consider enhancing code readability with a separate rating calculation.
The implementation correctly handles both the presence and absence of reviews. However, the rating calculation logic could be more readable if extracted into a separate function.
Consider this refactor for improved maintainability:
export let getJudgemeReviews = async (
api_token: string,
shop_domain: string,
handle: string,
weaverse: WeaverseClient
) => {
const defaultData = {
rating: 0,
reviewNumber: 0,
reviews: [],
};
if (!api_token) {
return defaultData;
}
let internalId = await getInternalIdByHandle(
api_token,
shop_domain,
handle,
weaverse
);
if (internalId) {
let data = (await weaverse.fetchWithCache(
`https://judge.me/api/v1/reviews?${new URLSearchParams({
api_token,
shop_domain,
product_id: internalId,
})}`
)) as JudgemeReviewsData;
let reviews = data.reviews;
- let rating =
- reviews.reduce((acc, review) => acc + review.rating, 0) /
- (reviews.length || 1);
+ let rating = calculateAverageRating(reviews);
return {
rating,
reviewNumber: reviews.length,
reviews,
};
}
return defaultData;
};
+ function calculateAverageRating(reviews: JudgemeReviewType[]): number {
+ return reviews.reduce((acc, review) => acc + review.rating, 0) / (reviews.length || 1);
+ }app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-form.tsx (2)
141-141: encType attribute may be unnecessary
Since the form does not include any file uploads, specifying encType="multipart/form-data" is unnecessary. The default application/x-www-form-urlencoded is sufficient.
Apply this diff to remove the encType attribute:
<fetcher.Form
onSubmit={handleSubmit}
ref={formRef}
method="POST"
- encType="multipart/form-data"
>197-203: Make the review text area required
To ensure users provide feedback, consider adding the required attribute to the review text area.
Apply this diff to add the required attribute:
<textarea
id="body"
name="body"
className="w-full border px-3 py-3 border-line outline-none focus-visible:border-line"
rows={4}
+ required
></textarea>📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- app/lib/judgeme.ts (1 hunks)
- app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-form.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-index.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-list.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-index.tsx (1)
5-6: LGTM: Appropriate imports added for data fetching.
The new imports properly support the data-driven approach for review rendering.
app/sections/judgeme-reviews/review-list.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Clean import addition
The new import for the JudgemeReviewsData type is properly structured and necessary for the component's type safety.
app/lib/judgeme.ts (2)
33-35: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.
The exported type with the new properties rating and reviewNumber provides better type safety and reusability across components, aligning well with the PR's objective of handling review data display.
33-35: Verify the type usage across components.
The JudgemeReviewsData type is now exported and includes new properties. Let's verify its usage across dependent components.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Type usage is consistent across components
The JudgemeReviewsData type with rating and reviewNumber properties is properly integrated:
- Imported and used correctly in review components (
review-form.tsx,review-list.tsx) - Properties are accessed consistently in the UI for displaying ratings and review counts
- Implementation in
judgeme.tsmatches the type definition and its usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of JudgemeReviewsData type and its properties
# across components
# Test 1: Find all imports of JudgemeReviewsData
echo "=== JudgemeReviewsData imports ==="
rg "import.*JudgemeReviewsData.*from.*judgeme"
# Test 2: Find usage of rating and reviewNumber properties
echo -e "\n=== Usage of new properties ==="
rg -A 2 "rating|reviewNumber"
Length of output: 10680
|
|
||
| type ReviewIndexProps = {}; | ||
| const ReviewIndex = forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, ReviewIndexProps>((props, ref) => { | ||
| let { ...rest } = props; | ||
|
|
||
| const { judgemeReviews } = useLoaderData<ProductLoaderType>(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
The review comment is valid but needs refinement
While error handling is important, the implementation should align with the existing patterns in the codebase:
- The app already has a root-level ErrorBoundary that handles route errors, so component-level error states should focus on UI-specific cases.
- The
judgemeReviewsdata is loaded at the route level, so loading states should be managed there rather than in the component.
Consider this alternative implementation:
const ReviewIndex = forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, ReviewIndexProps>((props, ref) => {
let { ...rest } = props;
const { judgemeReviews } = useLoaderData<ProductLoaderType>();
+
+ if (!judgemeReviews?.reviews) {
+ return null;
+ }
return (
<div ref={ref} {...rest} className="flex flex-col md:flex-row md:gap-10 gap-5">
<ReviewForm judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/>
- {judgemeReviews.reviews.length > 0 && (
+ {judgemeReviews.reviews.length > 0 ? (
<ReviewList judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/>
+ ) : (
+ <p>No reviews yet</p>
+ )}🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding error handling and loading states.
While the conditional rendering for empty reviews is good, consider handling these additional cases:
- Loading state while data is being fetched
- Error state if the data fetch fails
- Null check for
judgemeReviewsto handle potential undefined states
Let's verify if the loader handles these cases:
Consider updating the implementation to handle these cases:
const ReviewIndex = forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, ReviewIndexProps>((props, ref) => {
let { ...rest } = props;
- const { judgemeReviews } = useLoaderData<ProductLoaderType>();
+ const { judgemeReviews, state } = useLoaderData<ProductLoaderType>();
+
+ if (state === 'loading') return <div>Loading reviews...</div>;
+ if (!judgemeReviews) return <div>Unable to load reviews</div>;
+
return (
<div ref={ref} {...rest} className="flex flex-col md:flex-row md:gap-10 gap-5">
<ReviewForm judgemeReviews={judgemeReviews}/>Also applies to: 14-17
Let me try a different approach to verify the loader implementation and error handling.
Let me check the loader implementation in the product route file to understand how the data is handled.
Let me fix the syntax error in the command.
Let me try one last search to verify the error handling patterns in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the product loader implementation to check error handling
rg -A 10 "export.*loader.*ProductLoaderType"
Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for loader implementation in product-related files
fd "product.*\.(ts|tsx)$" | xargs rg -l "loader"
# Search for the ProductLoaderType definition
rg "type ProductLoaderType"
# Look for useLoaderData usage patterns
rg -A 5 "useLoaderData.*ProductLoaderType"
Length of output: 1641
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the loader implementation in the product route file
rg -B 5 -A 15 "export async function loader" app/routes/($locale).products.$productHandle.tsx
# Also check if there's any error boundary component
rg -A 10 "ErrorBoundary|error\s*=|catch\s*\(" app/routes/($locale).products.$productHandle.tsx
Length of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the loader implementation in the product route file
rg -B 5 -A 15 "export async function loader" "app/routes/\(\$locale\).products.\$productHandle.tsx"
# Also check if there's any error boundary component
rg -A 10 "ErrorBoundary|error\s*=|catch\s*\(" "app/routes/\(\$locale\).products.\$productHandle.tsx"
Length of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all product-related route files to get the correct path
fd "products.*\.tsx$"
# Search for error handling patterns in all TypeScript files
rg -A 5 "useLoaderData.*ProductLoaderType" --type ts
# Check for error boundaries in the app
rg -A 10 "ErrorBoundary" --type ts
Length of output: 2979
| export function ReviewList({judgemeReviews}: {judgemeReviews: JudgemeReviewsData}) { | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add handling for empty reviews state
Given that this PR aims to enhance the design when no reviews are found, the component should include explicit handling for empty reviews array.
Consider adding a conditional render:
export function ReviewList({judgemeReviews}: {judgemeReviews: JudgemeReviewsData}) {
+ if (!judgemeReviews.reviews.length) {
+ return (
+ <div className="lg:w-2/3 md:w-3/5 w-full py-6 flex flex-col items-center justify-center">
+ <span className="text-lg text-gray-500">No reviews yet. Be the first to review!</span>
+ </div>
+ );
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function ReviewList({judgemeReviews}: {judgemeReviews: JudgemeReviewsData}) { | |
| export function ReviewList({judgemeReviews}: {judgemeReviews: JudgemeReviewsData}) { | |
| if (!judgemeReviews.reviews.length) { | |
| return ( | |
| <div className="lg:w-2/3 md:w-3/5 w-full py-6 flex flex-col items-center justify-center"> | |
| <span className="text-lg text-gray-500">No reviews yet. Be the first to review!</span> | |
| </div> | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| }: { | ||
| judgemeReviews: JudgemeReviewsData; | ||
| }) { | ||
| const { product } = useLoaderData<ProductLoaderType>(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider passing product as a prop for consistency
Currently, judgemeReviews is passed as a prop to ReviewForm, but product is obtained using useLoaderData inside the component. For consistency and improved reusability, consider passing product as a prop as well.
…m handling with conditional rendering in review index
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
ReviewFormandReviewListcomponents to display detailed review information, including average ratings and total number of reviews.Bug Fixes
Documentation
These updates aim to provide users with a more informative and responsive review experience.