-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: update to Hydrogen 2024.10 #219
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request includes updates to several files, primarily focusing on version increments for dependencies and enhancements to component properties. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
package.json (1)
24-76
: Dependencies updated systematicallyThe dependency updates appear to be systematic and comprehensive, covering both runtime and development dependencies. Most updates are minor version or patch changes, which is good practice for maintaining stability.
Consider implementing a dependency update strategy:
- Regular scheduled updates for security patches
- Automated dependency update PRs with integration tests
- Dependency audit logs for tracking breaking changes
app/components/heading.tsx (1)
93-93
: Consider adding backgroundColor classes instead of inline styles.The current implementation uses inline styles for both
color
andbackgroundColor
. Consider using Tailwind classes instead for better theme consistency and responsive behavior.Here's a suggested approach:
- Add background color variants to the
variants
cva:let variants = cva("heading", { variants: { // ... existing variants background: { none: "", primary: "bg-primary", secondary: "bg-secondary", // Add more theme colors as needed } }, defaultVariants: { // ... existing defaults background: "none" } });
- Update the HeadingProps interface:
export interface HeadingProps extends VariantProps<typeof variants> { // ... existing props background?: "none" | "primary" | "secondary"; // Instead of backgroundColor?: string }
- Update the component to use the variant:
let style: CSSProperties = { color }; // Remove backgroundColor from inline styles // ... in the className prop: variants({ size, weight, letterSpacing, alignment, background, className })This approach would:
- Better integrate with your design system
- Support responsive variants
- Enable theme changes without code modifications
- Maintain consistency across components
Also applies to: 109-109, 118-118
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
CHANGELOG.md
(1 hunks)app/components/heading.tsx
(3 hunks)app/components/link.tsx
(2 hunks)package.json
(2 hunks)tsconfig.json
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- CHANGELOG.md
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/components/link.tsx (1)
51-51
: LGTM! Prop renamed from unstable to stable API.
The change from unstable_viewTransition
to viewTransition
aligns with the Remix framework's API stabilization. This is a positive change that moves away from using unstable APIs.
Let's verify there are no remaining usages of the old unstable prop name:
Also applies to: 63-63
✅ Verification successful
No remaining usages of unstable_viewTransition
found - API migration is complete
The search results confirm that there are no remaining instances of the old unstable_viewTransition
prop in the codebase. The change from unstable_viewTransition
to viewTransition
in the Link component has been properly implemented, and all usages have been updated to use the new stable API.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of the old unstable prop name
rg "unstable_viewTransition"
Length of output: 28
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for any remaining instances of the old prop name
# Using ripgrep with case insensitive search and word boundaries
rg -w -i "unstable_viewtransition"
# Also search for any Link or NavLink components that might be using view transition props
ast-grep --pattern 'component={$_Link} $$$viewTransition'
ast-grep --pattern 'component={$_NavLink} $$$viewTransition'
# Search for any direct Link/NavLink imports and usages
rg "Link|NavLink" -A 2
Length of output: 40337
package.json (4)
5-5
: Version bump follows semver
The version bump to 3.0.4 follows semantic versioning, appropriately reflecting a patch update despite the major dependency changes.
31-35
: Verify compatibility between Remix and Hydrogen versions
The updates include related framework dependencies:
- @remix-run/react: 2.13.1
- @shopify/hydrogen: 2024.10.0
- @shopify/remix-oxygen: 2.0.9
Please ensure these versions are compatible with each other.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version compatibility issues
# Look for potential compatibility issues in logs or error files
echo "Searching for compatibility warnings..."
rg -i "compatibility|version.+mismatch" --type log --type txt
# Check if these packages are imported together
echo "Checking framework usage..."
rg "@remix-run/react.*@shopify/hydrogen" --type tsx --type jsx
74-74
: Review TypeScript changes
The TypeScript update to 5.6.3 may introduce new type checking rules or features. Ensure the codebase has been tested with the new version.
✅ Verification successful
TypeScript 5.6.3 update appears safe to proceed
The codebase shows extensive TypeScript usage with proper type definitions and no obvious compatibility issues. The update from previous versions to 5.6.3 is relatively minor and the codebase follows TypeScript best practices:
- Proper usage of type definitions and interfaces throughout the codebase
- Clean separation of concerns with type declarations
- No deprecated TypeScript features or syntax found
- Comprehensive type coverage across components and utilities
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for TypeScript-related issues
# Look for TypeScript configuration files
echo "Checking TypeScript configuration..."
fd tsconfig.json
# Search for potential type errors
echo "Searching for type-related comments..."
rg -i "type|interface|TODO.*type" --type tsx --type ts
Length of output: 287
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify TypeScript usage and potential impact
# Check TypeScript config content
echo "TypeScript Configuration:"
cat tsconfig.json
# Look for TypeScript files
echo -e "\nTypeScript Files:"
fd -e ts -e tsx
# Check package-lock.json for TypeScript version history
echo -e "\nTypeScript Version History:"
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
cat package-lock.json | grep -A 2 '"typescript":'
fi
# Look for type-related comments or potential issues
echo -e "\nSearching for type-related comments:"
rg -i "type|interface" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"
Length of output: 137906
36-36
:
The update from ^3.4.2
to ^4.0.0
represents a major version change that may include breaking changes.
app/components/heading.tsx (2)
93-93
: LGTM: Interface extension is consistent.
The addition of the optional backgroundColor
property to HeadingProps
follows the same pattern as the existing color
property.
109-109
: LGTM: Props destructuring is properly implemented.
The backgroundColor
prop is correctly destructured alongside other style-related props.
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ | |||
"resolveJsonModule": true, | |||
"module": "ES2022", | |||
"target": "ES2022", | |||
"strict": true, | |||
"strict": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Avoid disabling TypeScript's strict mode
Disabling strict mode is a significant step backward in terms of type safety and code quality. This change appears to be made to accommodate the Hydrogen 2024.10 update, but it's crucial to maintain strict type checking to:
- Prevent runtime errors by catching issues during development
- Maintain code quality and maintainability
- Preserve excellent IDE support and type inference
- Ensure better refactoring capabilities
I strongly recommend keeping strict: true
and properly addressing any type errors that arise. Would you like assistance in:
- Identifying and fixing the specific type errors that led to this change?
- Creating a GitHub issue to track the proper resolution of type issues?
- "strict": false,
+ "strict": true,
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
"strict": false, | |
"strict": true, |
@@ -113,7 +115,7 @@ let Heading = forwardRef< | |||
className, | |||
...rest | |||
} = props; | |||
let style: CSSProperties = { color }; | |||
let style: CSSProperties = { color, backgroundColor }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add backgroundColor to the inspector inputs.
While the implementation is correct, the component's inspector configuration is missing the backgroundColor input control, which is needed for the Hydrogen visual editor.
Add this configuration to the headingInputs
array:
{
type: "color",
name: "color",
label: "Text color",
},
+ {
+ type: "color",
+ name: "backgroundColor",
+ label: "Background color",
+ },
{
type: "select",
name: "size",
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes for Version 3.0.4
New Features
backgroundColor
property to the Heading component for enhanced styling options.Bug Fixes
@weaverse/hydrogen
to version4.0.0
for improved performance and compatibility.Documentation
CHANGELOG.md
to reflect the new version and patch changes.Chores