Stabilize the Table of Contents Block

[priethor]

What problem does this address?

The table of content blocks was first released in Gutenberg 13.3 as an experimental block. A few releases later, no major bugs have been reported and we should start considering taking the block out of experimental.

What is your proposed solution?

Taking the block out of experimental would bring the block closer to shipping in WordPress 6.1.

Apart from removing the experimental flag in block.json it would be good to stabilize the dependent selector __experimentalGetGlobalBlocksByName, first introduced in #39610.

• @getdave do you see any reason not to stabilize the mentioned selector?
• @ZebulanStanphill @gziolo do you see any blocker not to stabilize the ToC block or other steps that should be done?

Pending items

• Stabilize the dependent selector __experimentalGetGlobalBlocksByName
• Table of Contents: support usage outside of Post Content #41173
• Table of Contents: fix undo history quirk #41031
• Add an aria-label attribute to the wrapping nav element
• Table of contents block – links don't work on initial page save #43595
• Add an option to control the heading levels
• Use the same block toolbar controls as the List block

[ZebulanStanphill]

My main concern with stabilizing the Table of Contents block is that, if the ideas in #41173 are implemented, it could drastically alter both the attribute schema and saved markup of the block. We might end up creating another backwards compatibility nightmare if we stabilize the block in its current form. I haven't had time to work on prototyping this idea, unfortunately.

The more I think about it, the more I realize that using a Table of Contents outside of the post content is actually the primary use-case for some website designs, so it feels almost wrong to have it be stabilized while it remains unusable there.

There's also the undo history bug described in #41031, which is just rather annoying to deal with. I have no clue how to fix it.

[bph]

While you are looking at another iteration on the Table of Content Block,
I am pulling the issue of missing options to modify how the headlines are displayed from the many comments from the original PR .
While testing in PR stage, I felt strongly that there needs to be a way for a user to change the style of the list created. Not everyone appreciates an ordered list, and would rather use bullet points or arrows or something else entirely.

During the various iterations it started out as bullet list.
After initial discussions about missing options, it was actually changed to an ordered list. Although, there were other voices to advocate for more options for the display of the headlines, it did not receive any further consideration,

• @paaljoachim commented on it.
• @juanmaguitar commented on it as well.

During the discussion, it was not accepted as a needed feature, and argued that it was in the theme developer's domain.

I still feel that an end user should be able to change the nature of the Table of Content list, via an option in the Sidebar, rather having the need to connect with a developer to modify the theme css.
In one comment it was mentioned that such settings should be in the Global Styles and deferred to a future interation.

To be consistent, most core blocks have myriad of options applied to each instance of the block, in addition to the theme.json settings for Global Styles.

For now, the current Table of Contents block doesn't provide neither block based options nor a theme.json or Global Style implementation to change the display of the Headlines.

With more options it would shine so much brighter, especially if it makes it into the next major WordPress release.

[ndiego]

I 100% agree with @bph and @ZebulanStanphill assessments. This block, while a great start, could use some additional love. To echo some of the previous comments:

1. The largest area of concern to me is the fact that it does not work outside of post content, thereby making the block unusable in the Site Editor. Without a fix here, I anticipate a lot of user confusion and frustration. You are able to add the TOC block to templates, yet it doesn't display anything.
2. The block needs more style settings to be consistent with other Core blocks. Color, typography, list style, and dimensions would be a good start.
3. There needs to be a way to control the headings that are displayed. A common use case is only to display H2 and H3s, but not the H4, H5, etc.

[getdave]

@getdave do you see any reason not to stabilize the mentioned selector?

As far as I'm aware there is no reason not to stablise this selector. Also noting it is not widely used.

[Mamaduka]

I think styling enhancements aren't necessary blockers for stabilization. These can be done after.

The "Table of Contents outside of the post content" is nice to have but not a blocker, in my opinion. My best guess is that we'll have to use dynamic rendering and parse content blocks to achieve this.

The "undo bug" breaks editor history, so it probably should be fixed before we consider stabilizing the block — recent findings from @kevin940726 on this issue - #41031 (comment).

P.S. It would be nice to stress test the block on large posts and see if it affects typing.

[ndiego]

Yeah, I am all for stabilizing. I just don't think we should include it in Core until the block is a bit more full-featured. While a great step forward, it feels incomplete.

[gziolo]

Yeah, I am all for stabilizing. I just don't think we should include it in Core until the block is a bit more full-featured. While a great step forward, it feels incomplete.

Technically speaking, the issue is about exposing this block for WordPress Core by removing the experimental flag that ensures Table of Contents block can be used only with the Gutenberg plugin.

The more I think about it, the more I realize that using a Table of Contents outside of the post content is actually the primary use-case for some website designs, so it feels almost wrong to have it be stabilized while it remains unusable there.

The "Table of Contents outside of the post content" is nice to have but not a blocker, in my opinion. My best guess is that we'll have to use dynamic rendering and parse content blocks to achieve this.

We need to make the decision whether this block should be general purpose and work everywhere or we limit its usage to the post editor. One way to approach it could by setting in block.json the ancestor field to core/post-content. It probably won't work out of the box, but it shouldn't be too difficult to implement.

In general, it's a challenge to ensure that the Table of Contents block stays in sync when some dynamic blocks change outside of the place where the table of contents gets updated. It's also an issue when using the post editor and you have a Reusable block with heading that can be modified in every place on the site.

[joedolson]

The table of contents block also needs to add an aria-label attribute to the wrapping nav element. There will almost always be other nav elements present on the page (the main navigation, at minimum), so this needs to be made clear. The obvious choice for single post views is just 'Table of Contents', but if it's used outside of a single post view, it'll need further differentiation from other tables of contents.

[apeatling]

cc @priethor to see if this is still important for 6.1.

[ZebulanStanphill]

I should note that due to being busy with several other things, it is unlikely that I will be able to help much with stabilizing the Table of Contents block, besides reviewing PRs from other people. If anyone wants to tackle the aforementioned issues, feel free to do so, because I simply don't have the time available to do so right now.

If you ask me, the switch back to dynamic rendering and the question of a bullet style option are two things that must be tackled prior to the block being considered stable.

[priethor]

I think it is still worth exploring having the ToC block in 6.1. I don't think being limited to the Post Editor is a blocker; to me, it's an opportunity to include it earlier with a limited scope and iterate later on it.

[ZebulanStanphill]

My primary concern is not the limitations it would have if merged now, but rather the backwards-compatibility burden it would cause later on, if (or most likely, when) the implementation changes. I've already seen several recent cases of core blocks having to make a bunch of compromises due to an inability to update existing static-rendered blocks on the front-end. For example:

• The reverted attempt to remove the wrapping <div> from the Button block's markup. Update the buttons block to use the new color support flag. #21266, Revert the button block to the previous markup #21923
• Adding a wp-block-heading class to the Heading block. [Heading block] Add a wp-block-heading CSS class #42122
• Difficulties in adding a new default layout mode for the Group block. Try "constrained" content width as new layout type #42763

[priethor]

Bringing this to @michalczaplinski and @ockham's attention as a decision needs to be made for 6.1.

While I'm all in for including this in core feature-wise, apart from that, it hasn't been released in Gutenberg in a stable manner yet and won't be before Beta 1.

[michalczaplinski]

Based on all the concerns in the current thread I would not feel comfortable including the Table of Contents block in the 6.1 in its current form.

It seems that we'd at least need to complete the following:

• Table of Contents: fix undo history quirk #41031 - this is just a bugfix but an annoying one it seems.
• Table of Contents: support usage outside of Post Content #41173 - adding support for this likely means switching to dynamic rendering of the block. This means that if we were to stabilize the current (static) version of the block, it would create compatibility problems when adding this fix later on.
• Add the ability to customize the style of the list in the Table of Contents as mentioned by @bph in this comment above.

The Feature Freeze for 6.1 is in exactly 2 weeks. Are there any volunteers that would like to work on those features so that we could stabilize the ToC block and include it in the 6.1 ? Are there any other issues that would be considered must-haves? 🙂

[ndiego]

The TOC block was not included in the 6.1 Beta, so I am going to remove this PR from the 6.1 Project Board.

[priethor]

Let's aim to have this for 6.2 🙏

[NicoHood]

So is this block still on the roadmap for 6.2? It would be great to have, as its been in development for so long now :)

[annezazu]

Pinging 6.2 Editor Tech co-leads @Mamaduka and @ntsekouras as a heads up as this was punted from 6.1. Going to add to 6.2's project board for now for consideration.

[ntsekouras]

I haven't worked or followed much of the work for this block, but after reading the described issues, I'd have to echo @michalczaplinski comment

Based on all the concerns in the current thread I would not feel comfortable including the Table of Contents block in the 6.1 in its current form.

Since the discussions for 6.1 there was no activity at all for moving this forward, so I don't think we can stabilize it.

What we should do though is try to actively move forward the remaining issues as soon as possible, in order to include it in 6.3.

[priethor]

Let's punt this issue from 6.2, as it's in the same situation as it was before 6.1.

[mahnunchik]

Any chance to have ToC block enabled in 6.2?

Question: how to enable ToC block manually? I really need it 😉

[richtabor]

The block needs more style settings to be consistent with other Core blocks. Color, typography, list style, and dimensions would be a good start.

Just following up that these are now added:

[richtabor]

The table of contents block also needs to add an aria-label attribute to the wrapping nav element.

The "Table of Contents outside of the post content" is nice to have but not a blocker, in my opinion. My best guess is that we'll have to use dynamic rendering and parse content blocks to achieve this.

@Mamaduka Is it possible to have it always pull headings from the post content, wherever the block is rendered on the page (within templates or not)? Re: #41173 (comment)

Seems these are the last two bits to get this in.

[richtabor]

At the moment, the TOC block is restricted as a hard-coded ordered list.

Perhaps we could use the same block toolbar controls as the List block, but apply list style CSS instead of changing the markup.

[ghost]

Are the authors Zebullan or Priethor still commited for this block to be stabilized? What course of action is proposed now? Plan A and plan B? There are some open issues. If all cannot be attained at the same time as it seems, what should be prioritized and what should be discarded? Let's discuss this to have a clear path.
Kindly,

(The Details block and the Footnotes block recently landed, and they had their scope limited in the development. So far so good despite the limitations. I just asked myself if that is also the way for the TOC block).

[annezazu]

There's a clear path right now. The blocker is someone diving in to do the work right now. For 6.3, we weren't able to get someone in place who could do so.

[ZebulanStanphill]

My schedule is very busy lately, so it is unlikely that I will be able to do much here, though I'll try and review any PRs relating to the block if I have the time.

[Mamaduka]

@annezazu, @priethor can you update the description and include list of items required for stabilization?

I’ll try to resolve those items before WP 6.4.

[priethor]

I've consolidated the remaining items in the issue description. 🚀

[Mamaduka]

The #54224 is ready for review. Fixes the undo quirk and page permalink bugs.

[bph]

As a follow-up on the decision that the Table of Content will not be shipping in 6.4, I removed it from the project board

[phanduynam]

Looks like the table of contents block is not published on wordpress 6.5.2

[phanduynam]

WordPress version 6.5.3 does not have a table of contents block, I recommend adding a Table of Contents block to WordPress 6.6 to quickly create a table of contents based on all the headings on a page. From then on I won't need to install the Table of Contents Plugin anymore.

[mikachan]

Would the Table of Contents block be a good candidate for a canonical block plugin? I see it mentioned on this related issue: #58773. It would still need to be installed as a plugin, but as it would be a block plugin this would be a smoother experience, as they can be installed directly from the inserter.

Edit: I just saw your comment over on the same issue 😄

[phanduynam]

Would the Table of Contents block be a good candidate for a canonical block plugin? I see it mentioned on this related issue: #58773. It would still need to be installed as a plugin, but as it would be a block plugin this would be a smoother experience, as they can be installed directly from the inserter.

There are a total of about 1 million active installs for the Table of Contents plugins, which I think is large enough to include the Table of Contents Block in WordPress core

[masteradhoc]

@richtabor any chance to get this stabilized soon?

[asafm7]

I don't know if this is a known issue and if it is the place to report it, but when using the Gutenberg TOC on a WooCommerce Single Product template the headings are listed properly, but the items on the TOC aren't linking to them - they are just static <li>.

[annezazu]

I work with folks on the Woo side and will ping them about this!

[WunderBart]

I don't know if this is a known issue and if it is the place to report it, but when using the Gutenberg TOC on a WooCommerce Single Product template the headings are listed properly, but the items on the TOC aren't linking to them - they are just static <li>.

@asafm7, it seems to be behaving like that for me on all templates, with only the Gutenberg plugin enabled (no WooCommerce). For example, if you add it to Blog Home it will also render static items. Could you check that on your side, please? 🙏

[asafm7]

@WunderBart I tried it in a Single Post template which I considered the most straightforward use case for the TOC block. It doesn't work at all in this use case - nothing is showing on the front end.

In the block description, it says "Headings with HTML anchors will be linked here". I've tried adding HTML Anchors to the headings and it is still not working.

Unless I'm missing something, the editor doesn't seem to automatically add anchors to headings anyway, which makes the usage of the TOC block, even if it did work, a bit tedious.

[WunderBart]

@WunderBart I tried it in a Single Post template which I considered the most straightforward use case for the TOC block. It doesn't work at all in this use case - nothing is showing on the front end.

In the block description, it says "Headings with HTML anchors will be linked here". I've tried adding HTML Anchors to the headings and it is still not working.

Unless I'm missing something, the editor doesn't seem to automatically add anchors to headings anyway, which makes the usage of the TOC block, even if it did work, a bit tedious.

Thanks for checking, @asafm7. I'm trying to verify if the TOC block is broken specifically in the WooCommerce context or if it's broken upstream. For me, the buggy behavior I described above is the same regardless of whether I have the WooCommerce plugin active or not. Having said that, I've tested against the Single Posts template as you did above, and while it does not render the Headings with HTML anchors will be linked here placeholder for me, it still renders static list items instead of links:

editor	frontend

[asafm7]

Thanks, @WunderBart. So yes, it seems to be a general template-context issue rather than a WooCommerce issue.