-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Global Styles: Try per block custom CSS #46571
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4d0ce99
WIP, try adding per block custom css to global styles
carolinan 24465f7
Update class-wp-theme-json-6-2.php
carolinan d5f0bf4
Update use-global-styles-output.js
carolinan d4dee8b
Add the CSS selector to the global styles output in the editor.
carolinan e36ebbf
Update use-global-styles-output.js
carolinan 16a7720
Process CSS nesting
aristath 30e2877
Merge branch 'trunk' into try/per-block-custom-css
carolinan 6480d15
Add permission check
carolinan 165e47a
Fix CS issue, spacing
carolinan b58f823
Update context menu, simplify condition when loading the CSS
carolinan 2c91d03
rename method
aristath 7e943bc
make method public
aristath db2c12b
Add unit tests
aristath d218090
rename method
aristath 7f3a74e
Move processCSSNesting function
aristath ccdc5df
simplify code - props @mamaduka
aristath 74057df
Merge branch 'trunk' into try/per-block-custom-css
aristath 241a383
Simplify the loop some more - props @mamaduka
aristath File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we sure we want this method to be public?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well... In the beginning, I made it public to make testing the method easier.
But the more I think about it, the more I like it... The method doesn't change anything in the object itself, so I don't see a reason to make it private, as it's pretty self-isolated. This way it will be possible for 3rd parties to use it in their own implementations if they choose to do something with nested CSS. In fact, we could even make it a static function and nothing would change. Perhaps it would even be preferable? 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's the reason I asked. If the method is
public
just for unit tests, then we can make itprotected
and test the expected output usingget_stylesheet()
. We already do this for global custom CSS.If you think it could be helpful outside of this particular case, then sure, keeping it public makes sense.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note
WP_Theme_JSON
andWP_Theme_JsON_Resolver
are private classes, which means we're asking people not to use them. The API should provide public methods for any operation third-parties may need. See related conversation at #45171Would you mind making this protected?