-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
withBlockTree: simplify code that replaces/removes controlled blocks #61234
Conversation
1b09f29
to
d666359
Compare
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.
To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
if ( ! inserterClientIds[ clientId ] ) { | ||
newState.tree.delete( 'controlled||' + clientId ); | ||
} | ||
} ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is a for loop not better even?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe it is. This reducer.js
file uses both variants 10+ times -- there is an opportunity for a PR that unifies them one way or the other.
Size Change: -1 B (0%) Total Size: 1.74 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
Flaky tests detected in d666359. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/8893572507
|
A little thing I noticed recently when reviewing the
useBlockSync
changes. The code that replaces/removes controlled blocks doesn't need to use a complex.concat
/.filter
/.map
machinery. It can be a simple loop over the list ofclientId
s.