Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/ #636 Module Specific Readme Files #663

Conversation

10upsimon
Copy link
Contributor

@10upsimon 10upsimon commented Mar 2, 2023

Summary

Addresses #636

Relevant technical choices

  • Adds placeholder readme.txt files to all performance plugin module folders for further enhancement and completion in future commits.
  • Flags all standalone readme.txt files in all performance plugin module folders for export-ignore via .gitattributes.
  • Adds draft v1 of readme.txt file contents for WebP Uploads module for review & iteration.

Checklist

  • PR has either [Focus] or Infrastructure label.
  • PR has a [Type] label.
  • PR has a milestone or the no milestone label.

@10upsimon 10upsimon added [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement of an existing feature Infrastructure Issues for the overall performance plugin infrastructure Creating standalone plugins labels Mar 2, 2023
@10upsimon 10upsimon added the no milestone PRs that do not have a defined milestone for release label Mar 2, 2023
@10upsimon 10upsimon closed this Mar 2, 2023
@10upsimon 10upsimon reopened this Mar 2, 2023
@10upsimon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favour of #664 due to poor choice of branch naming in this PR.

@10upsimon 10upsimon closed this Mar 2, 2023
@felixarntz felixarntz deleted the feature/issue-636-module-specific-readme-files branch February 26, 2024 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Infrastructure Issues for the overall performance plugin infrastructure no milestone PRs that do not have a defined milestone for release [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement of an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant