-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refresh feature branch with trunk
(due to unit test failures fixed)
#882
Conversation
Updated Inline PHP Documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not just push directly? Creating a PR for that is rather unusual.
I was just going to raise this point. Currently branch protections are blocking any direct pushes to feature branches. This adds too much friction, IMO. I think feature branch pushes should be allowed. |
@swissspidy It's not possible because of branch protections, see Weston's comment. @westonruter I agree it's not ideal, let's discuss how we can improve it without giving up branch protection completely. In the meantime, we can probably still merge this? |
Well you can specify which branches should be protected with glob patterns. Only |
@swissspidy It's not that simple. Sure, we could do that, but branch protection is also to prevent accidental deletion, e.g. relevant for the configuration for automatically deleting PR branches. If this branch protection of feature branches leads to more headaches than it helps, we can consider getting rid of it, but that does not only come with benefits - otherwise we would have never enabled it in the first place. |
Branch protection can be enabled to prevent deletion without also blocking pushes. |
Summary
Mostly relevant because of the fix in #881 that was merged into
trunk
.Checklist
[Focus]
orInfrastructure
label.[Type]
label.no milestone
label.