-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GitHub Actionsワークフローの改善: トリガーイベントとトークンの変更 #11
Merged
yuminn-k
merged 5 commits into
YJU-OKURA:main
from
yuminn-k:fix/update-code-review-workflow
Feb 13, 2024
Merged
GitHub Actionsワークフローの改善: トリガーイベントとトークンの変更 #11
yuminn-k
merged 5 commits into
YJU-OKURA:main
from
yuminn-k:fix/update-code-review-workflow
Feb 13, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Change trigger event from pull_request_target to pull_request. - Rename job from test to code_review. - Use ADMIN_TOKEN instead of GITHUB_TOKEN for enhanced permissions.
yuminn-k
added
⚙ Setting
개발 환경 세팅
⏰ P3
추가적인 의견 제시나 소소한 개선사항
🐞 BugFix
Something isn't working
🔨 Refactor
코드 리팩토링
labels
Feb 13, 2024
- Change the method of passing GITHUB_TOKEN from 'env' to 'with' in the OpenAI Code Review workflow. - This update addresses the issue where the token was not correctly recognized by the GitHub Actions runner. - Ensure consistent and secure token transmission for the workflow.
- Revert to using 'env' for passing the GITHUB_TOKEN, OPENAI_API_KEY, and LANGUAGE to the ChatGPT-CodeReview action. - Change the event trigger from 'pull_request' to 'pull_request_target' to enhance security and functionality of the workflow. - This update addresses issues with token recognition and aligns with GitHub Actions security best practices.
- Change the event trigger back to 'pull_request' for the OpenAI Code Review workflow. - This modification ensures that the workflow responds to pull requests from forked repositories, enabling automated code reviews for external contributions. - Maintain consistent and secure handling of pull requests in the workflow.
- Update the GitHub Actions workflow to use the 'pull_request_target' event. - This change allows the workflow to access the repository's secrets, enabling automated code review with the 'anc95/ChatGPT-CodeReview' action for pull requests from forked repositories. - Ensure enhanced security and functionality by allowing access to necessary secrets while handling external contributions.
Regulus0811
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2024
Regulus0811
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2024
yuminn-k
requested review from
Z00One and
Regulus0811
and removed request for
Z00One
February 13, 2024 06:45
Regulus0811
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2024
Regulus0811
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2024
Z00One
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔍 このPRで解決したい問題は何ですか?
GitHub Actionsのワークフロー設定において、より効果的なプルリクエスト管理のための改善を目指しています。この変更により、PRが作成されたときに自動的にコードレビューが行われるようになります。これは、コードの品質を維持し、開発プロセスの効率を高めるために重要です。
✨ このPRで主に変わったことは何ですか?
🔖 主な変更点以外に追加で変更された部分はありますか?
なし
🙏🏻 Reviewerに特に見ていただきたい部分はありますか?
ADMIN_TOKEN
の使用によるセキュリティへの影響。🩺 このPRでテストや検証が必要な部分はありますか?
ADMIN_TOKEN
の権限設定の確認。📚 関連するIssueやドキュメントのリンク
#4
🖥 作動する様子
📌 PRを行う際の注意点
📝 AssigneeのためのCheckList