Document chain value balances consensus rules with new format

[oxarbitrage]

Motivation

We want to change the doc of this rules to follow a new format standard for easier consensus rule searching in Zebra.

Close #3221
Close #3219
Close #3220

Additionally the consensus rule about the transparent value pool inside the transaction itself was also updated (this does not have an open issue as far as i know)

Close #3209

Solution

As we implement the chain value balances rules in the same function i decided to document all together in a single PR.

Review

Anyone can review, no code is changed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3286 (e8b3303) into main (534494f) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head e8b3303 differs from pull request most recent head e3f92b1. Consider uploading reports for the commit e3f92b1 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3286      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.13%   77.13%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         265      265              
  Lines       31342    31342              
==========================================
- Hits        24177    24176       -1     
- Misses       7165     7166       +1     

[teor2345]

Additionally the consensus rule about the transparent value pool inside the transaction itself was also updated (this does not have an open issue as far as i know)

It's #3209, I updated the PR description.

[teor2345]

We need to be careful that we don't confuse transaction fees (the remaining transaction value) and transparent outputs (the spendable transparent value).

[oxarbitrage]

I think this is ready but i don't have admin merge privileges so enabled auto merge for when someone approves.

[teor2345]

I think this is ready but i don't have admin merge privileges so enabled auto merge for when someone approves.

Hopefully the build bot will fix this too.