This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 10, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hardware PWM capture #5
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
No...not possible until the next revision I changed the IRQ disable time to 50us ish already not good enough? On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Pavel Kirienko notifications@github.com
|
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@ctech4285 As discussed, I have implemented hardware PWM capture. It is necessary since the charge pump driver disables IRQ for long periods of time, which may lead to unreliable PWM tracking if implemented in software.
This change requires to move the PWM input signal from
PIO2_10toPIO1_8.The code has been tested on my setup and it seems to work just fine.