Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scancode-Toolkit Doc Improvements #32

Closed
9 of 15 tasks
AyanSinhaMahapatra opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed
9 of 15 tasks

Scancode-Toolkit Doc Improvements #32

AyanSinhaMahapatra opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@AyanSinhaMahapatra
Copy link
Member

AyanSinhaMahapatra commented Oct 28, 2019

The following tasks are remaining in terms of improving the Scancode-Toolkit Docs
[Before Next Release and Migration]

This part I'll complete.

  1. Major Improvements
  • Getting Started Section [ 214b8e8 ]
  • Support for First-Timers [ cdc4976 ]
  • Document support For pip install [ 94b50ca ]
  • Document python 3 related installations and others [ 94b50ca ]
  1. Linking Sphinx Docs
  • Add Intersphinx to nexB/aboutcode [ 6dbe59f ]
  • Add Intersphinx to nexB/scancode-toolkit [ 3187b34 ]
  • Add Intersphinx related Docs [ f1b2414 ]

The following sections I'd need help on:-

  1. CLI Options Marked as [ToDo] (For Improvement)
  1. Related Bugs Open
@AyanSinhaMahapatra
Copy link
Member Author

@pombredanne @MaJuRG What should happen with this issue and #28? Should this be moved to nexB/scancode-toolkit? Into aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1813 and then this and the other closed?

@mjherzog
Copy link
Member

@AyanSinhaMahapatra this should be moved to nexb/scancode-toolkit.

@AyanSinhaMahapatra
Copy link
Member Author

@mjherzog I've just updated aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1813 to have all these issues which are not solved yet, this can be closed. Thank you.

@mjherzog
Copy link
Member

Closing (belatedly) in favor of aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1813 .

AyanSinhaMahapatra pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 30, 2022
Check for deps in local thirdparty directory #31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants