Skip to content

Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

acetinkaya/Breast-Cancer-Classification-with-ML-Algorithms

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

13 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Breast-Cancer-Classification-with-ML-Algorithms

Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Authors

  • Irem Ozcan
    Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Hakan Aydın
    Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul Topkapı University, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Ali Çetinkaya
    Department of Electronics Technology, Istanbul Gelisim Vocational School, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey

For Correspondence: alcetinkaya@gelisim.edu.tr

Article Information

Abstract

Objective: To identify which Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are the most successful in predicting and diagnosing breast cancer according to accuracy rates. Methods: The “College of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Dataset”, which consists of 569 data and 30 features, was classified using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), XgBoost (XGB), Ada-Boost (ABC) and Gradient Boosting (GBC) ML algorithms. Before the classification process, the dataset was preprocessed. Sensitivity, accuracy, and definiteness metrics were used to measure the success of the methods. Result: Compared to other ML algorithms used in the study, the GBC ML algorithm was found to be the most successful method in the classification of tumors with an accuracy of 99.12%. The XGB ML algorithm was found to be the lowest method with an accuracy rate of 88.10%. In addition, it was determined that the general accuracy rates of the 11 ML algorithms used in the study varied between 88-95%.Conclusion: When the results obtained from the ML classifiers used in the study are evaluated, the efficiency of the GBC algorithm in the classification of tumors is obvious. It can be said that the success rates obtained from 11 different ML algorithms used in the study are valuable in terms of being used to predict different cancer types.

Keywords: Machine Learning, Breast Cancer, Classification, Data Management, Information Systems

How to Cite

  • IEEE: I. Ozcan, H. Aydin, and A. Cetinkaya, “Comparison of classification success rates of different machine learning algorithms in the diagnosis of breast cancer,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 3287–3297, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.10.3287.

  • APA: Ozcan, I., Aydin, H., & Cetinkaya, A. (2022). Comparison of classification success rates of different machine learning algorithms in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP, 23(10), 3287.

  • MLA: Ozcan, Irem, Hakan Aydin, and Ali Cetinkaya. "Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer." Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 23, no. 10, 2022, pp. 3287-3297. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.10.3287.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License, allowing non-commercial sharing and adaptation with proper attribution.


AlternatifMetin

About

Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published