Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/fix appveyor #77

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

Feature/fix appveyor #77

merged 16 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

acgetchell
Copy link
Owner

@acgetchell acgetchell commented Nov 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added manual trigger option for clang-format checks.
    • Introduced a new configuration file for enhanced project management and code quality checks.
  • Improvements

    • Updated C++ standard from C++20 to C++23 across multiple components.
    • Simplified CGAL dependency management by removing platform-specific conditions.
    • Enhanced workflow for macOS to improve symlink removal process.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling for compiler version requirements for C++23 support.
  • Chores

    • Updated clang-format version for formatting checks.
    • Modified build configuration for improved caching behavior in AppVeyor.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@acgetchell has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41fedd6 and 98d26d5.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several updates across multiple configuration files. Key changes include the addition of a manual trigger for the clang-format workflow and an upgrade of clang-format from version 18 to 19. The CMake configuration is enhanced to require a minimum version of 3.16 and updates the C++ standard to C++23, along with new error handling for compiler version checks. Additionally, the project dependencies are simplified, and a new configuration file for project management is introduced.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/clang-format-check.yml - Added manual trigger workflow_dispatch
- Updated clang-format version from '18' to '19'
CMakeLists.txt - Minimum CMake version updated to 3.16
- C++ standard updated to cxx_std_23
- Added error handling for compiler versions
- Modified CGAL package configuration to remove Qt5 dependency
cmake/StandardProjectSettings.cmake - Removed /utf-8 option for MSVC
- Added -finput-charset=UTF-8 for non-MSVC compilers
- Updated C++ standard to C++23
src/CMakeLists.txt - Updated C++ standard to cxx_std_23 for initialize, cdt-opt, and cdt executables
- Commented out build sections for cdt-viewer and bistellar-flip
src/bistellar-flip.cpp - Introduced conditional compilation for visualization based on ENABLE_VISUALIZATION macro
tests/CMakeLists.txt - Updated C++ standard to cxx_std_23 for CDT_unit_tests executable
vcpkg.json - Simplified cgal dependency by removing platform-specific entries
.coderabbit.yaml - Introduced a new configuration file with settings for project management, reviews, and code quality tools
.appveyor.yml - Updated APPVEYOR_SAVE_CACHE_ON_ERROR from true to false
- Added new variable APPVEYOR_CACHE_SKIP_RESTORE set to true
.github/workflows/macos.yml - Streamlined removal of Python symlinks with a single loop instead of multiple commands

Possibly related PRs

  • Feature/c++23 #76: The changes in the main PR regarding the update of the C++ standard to C++23 are directly related to the objectives of PR Feature/c++23 #76, which focuses on updating the project to utilize C++23 features.

🌟 In code we trust, to standards we cling,
With clang-format ready, let the workflows sing!
CMake's new rules, a bright path we pave,
For C++23, we’re bold and we’re brave.
Dependencies simplified, our project takes flight,
With .coderabbit.yaml, our future looks bright! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/CMakeLists.txt (1)

21-21: Update the outdated comment above the C++ standard setting.

The comment "Activate C++20 features" is now incorrect since the code sets C++23 standard.

-# Activate C++20 features
+# Activate C++23 features
 target_compile_features(CDT_unit_tests PRIVATE cxx_std_23)
src/CMakeLists.txt (1)

43-73: Consider documenting CI build optimization strategy.

The strategy of disabling QT-dependent builds in CI to avoid long build times is reasonable, but it would be helpful to:

  1. Document this decision in the project's build documentation
  2. Consider adding a CI-specific build preset that explicitly defines these configurations
  3. Evaluate if there's a way to cache QT builds in CI to enable these tests in the future
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a79eed9 and f084b58.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/workflows/clang-format-check.yml (2 hunks)
  • CMakeLists.txt (2 hunks)
  • cmake/StandardProjectSettings.cmake (0 hunks)
  • src/CMakeLists.txt (4 hunks)
  • src/bistellar-flip.cpp (1 hunks)
  • tests/CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)
  • vcpkg.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • cmake/StandardProjectSettings.cmake
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/bistellar-flip.cpp
🔇 Additional comments (7)
vcpkg.json (1)

19-19: LGTM! Simplified CGAL dependency configuration.

The simplified CGAL dependency declaration makes the configuration more maintainable. However, since the Qt feature was previously enabled specifically for macOS, we should verify this change doesn't impact macOS builds.

Let's verify the CGAL configuration in the CMake files:

✅ Verification successful

Simplified CGAL dependency is safe to use

The codebase analysis shows that Qt-related CGAL functionality was already commented out and only used optionally for visualization tools (cdt-viewer and bistellar-flip) in development builds on macOS, not in CI. The main functionality of the project doesn't depend on CGAL's Qt components, making this simplification safe.

  • The Qt dependency was already guarded by if(APPLE AND NOT ($ENV{CI})) conditions
  • Qt-based visualization was explicitly avoided in CI due to long build times
  • Core functionality uses only the basic CGAL features
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check CGAL-related configuration in CMake files
# Expected: Find any Qt-related CGAL configurations that might need updating

# Search for CGAL-related configurations in CMake files
fd -e cmake -e txt --exec rg -A 5 'find_package.*CGAL|CGAL.*COMPONENTS|CGAL.*Qt'

Length of output: 356


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any Qt-related CGAL usage in the codebase
rg -A 5 'CGAL.*Qt|Qt.*CGAL'

# Also check for any GUI or visualization related code that might depend on Qt
rg -A 5 'Qt5|visualization.*CGAL|CGAL.*visualization'

# Check CMakeLists.txt files specifically
fd CMakeLists.txt --exec cat {}

Length of output: 10317

.github/workflows/clang-format-check.yml (1)

10-10: LGTM! Good addition of manual trigger.

Adding workflow_dispatch enables manual workflow runs, which is helpful for testing and maintenance.

tests/CMakeLists.txt (1)

21-21: Verify compiler compatibility with C++23.

The upgrade to C++23 is significant and requires careful consideration:

  1. Ensure that the minimum compiler versions in your CI environment (especially AppVeyor's MSVC) support C++23
  2. Verify that all dependencies (CGAL, TBB, fmt, date-tz) are compatible with C++23

Consider adding compiler version checks to prevent build failures:

# Add this before setting the C++23 standard
if(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID STREQUAL "MSVC")
    if(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION VERSION_LESS "19.34")
        message(FATAL_ERROR "MSVC version must be at least 19.34 for C++23 support")
    endif()
elseif(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID STREQUAL "GNU")
    if(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION VERSION_LESS "12.0")
        message(FATAL_ERROR "GCC version must be at least 12.0 for C++23 support")
    endif()
elseif(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID STREQUAL "Clang")
    if(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION VERSION_LESS "15.0")
        message(FATAL_ERROR "Clang version must be at least 15.0 for C++23 support")
    endif()
endif()

Let's verify the current compiler support in the CI:

✅ Verification successful

Let's examine the actual compiler configurations in these CI files to verify C++23 compatibility.


Let's check the dependencies' compatibility and any existing C++ standard settings in the project.


C++23 compatibility is well-supported in the current setup

The verification shows that:

  • CI uses modern compiler versions that support C++23: GCC 14, Clang 19
  • All main targets already use C++23 standard consistently
  • Key dependencies (CGAL, TBB, fmt, date) are managed through vcpkg which provides C++23-compatible versions
  • The project has proper compiler version checks in place through CMake configuration

The suggested compiler version checks are not necessary as:

  1. The CI environment already enforces compatible compiler versions
  2. CMake's CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON setting (already present) will fail the build if C++23 is not supported
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check compiler configurations in CI files

# Test: Look for compiler version specifications in CI config
echo "Searching for compiler configurations in CI files..."
rg -l "compiler|MSVC|clang|gcc" .github/workflows/ .appveyor.yml

Length of output: 650


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check compiler versions in key CI files
echo "=== MSVC Configuration ==="
rg -A 5 "msvc|MSVC" .github/workflows/windows-msvc.yml .appveyor.yml

echo -e "\n=== GCC Configuration ==="
rg -A 5 "gcc|GCC" .github/workflows/linux-gcc.yml

echo -e "\n=== Clang Configuration ==="
rg -A 5 "clang|CLANG" .github/workflows/linux-clang.yml

# Also check CMake files for any existing compiler version checks
echo -e "\n=== Existing CMake Compiler Checks ==="
rg "CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER" CMakeLists.txt cmake/

Length of output: 1678


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check vcpkg manifest for dependencies and their versions
echo "=== Checking vcpkg.json for dependencies ==="
cat vcpkg.json

# Check for existing C++ standard settings across the project
echo -e "\n=== Existing C++ Standard Settings ==="
rg "cxx_std|CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD" -A 2

# Check minimum CMake version requirement
echo -e "\n=== CMake Version Requirement ==="
rg "cmake_minimum_required" CMakeLists.txt

Length of output: 2257

CMakeLists.txt (2)

88-89: LGTM! Simplified CGAL dependency.

Removing the optional Qt5 component simplifies the dependency and reduces potential build issues. This change aligns well with the goal of fixing AppVeyor builds by reducing complexity.


33-33: Verify compiler support for C++23 in CI environments.

Upgrading to C++23 is a significant change that might affect build stability. While this could help with AppVeyor issues, we should ensure all CI environments have compatible compiler versions.

Let's check the compiler requirements:

✅ Verification successful

These additional checks will help us verify if the C++23 requirement is properly supported across all CI environments and build configurations.


C++23 upgrade is well-supported across CI environments

The verification shows that the C++23 requirement is properly configured and supported:

  • Travis CI uses modern compilers: GCC-12 and Clang-19
  • CMake configuration properly sets C++23 standard across all targets
  • Compiler-specific configurations are in place for MSVC, GCC, and Clang
  • UTF-8 encoding support is properly configured for all major compilers
  • The standard is consistently set to C++23 in all relevant targets (initialize, cdt-opt, cdt, tests)

The upgrade to C++23 appears to be a deliberate and well-implemented change with appropriate compiler support across all CI environments.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check compiler version requirements for C++23 support
# Test: Search for compiler version specifications in CI config files
rg -g '*.{yml,yaml}' 'compiler|MSVC|clang|gcc|g\+\+'

Length of output: 1276


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check GitHub Actions workflow files and any other configuration files
# that might specify compiler requirements or C++ standard settings
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/

Length of output: 609


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check CMake minimum version and any other C++ standard related configurations
rg "cmake_minimum|cxx_std|CMAKE_CXX" --type cmake

Length of output: 1711


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any platform-specific compiler configurations
rg "MSVC|Clang|GCC" --type cmake

Length of output: 1107

src/CMakeLists.txt (2)

108-111: LGTM: Test configuration properly matches build conditions.

The conditional test configuration correctly aligns with the build conditions for the cdt-viewer target.


13-13: Verify compiler compatibility with C++23.

The upgrade from C++20 to C++23 might cause build issues on some platforms. Please ensure that:

  1. All target platforms have compilers with adequate C++23 support
  2. AppVeyor's build environment supports C++23

Also applies to: 26-26, 40-40

✅ Verification successful

Let's examine the actual compiler configurations in these files to verify C++23 support.


C++23 compatibility is verified across build environments

The CI configurations show modern compiler versions that support C++23:

  • GCC 14 (which has full C++23 support)
  • Clang 19 (latest version with C++23 support)
  • Visual Studio 2022 with LLVM/Clang-cl (supports C++23 features)

The upgrade to C++23 is safe to proceed with the current CI setup.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for compiler version requirements in build configuration files
rg -l "compiler|MSVC|clang|gcc" .github/workflows/ .appveyor.yml

Length of output: 535


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check compiler versions and configurations in CI files
echo "=== AppVeyor Configuration ==="
rg "compiler|MSVC|clang|gcc|std" .appveyor.yml -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== GitHub Workflows - MSVC ==="
rg "compiler|MSVC|visual|std" .github/workflows/windows-msvc.yml -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== GitHub Workflows - GCC ==="
rg "compiler|gcc|g\+\+|std" .github/workflows/linux-gcc.yml -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== GitHub Workflows - Clang ==="
rg "compiler|clang|std" .github/workflows/linux-clang.yml -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 1206

.github/workflows/clang-format-check.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/CMakeLists.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
@acgetchell
Copy link
Owner Author

@CodeRabbit configuration

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

CodeRabbit configuration
language: en-US
tone_instructions: ''
early_access: false
enable_free_tier: true
reviews:
  profile: chill
  request_changes_workflow: false
  high_level_summary: true
  high_level_summary_placeholder: '@coderabbitai summary'
  auto_title_placeholder: '@coderabbitai'
  review_status: true
  commit_status: true
  poem: true
  collapse_walkthrough: false
  sequence_diagrams: true
  changed_files_summary: true
  labeling_instructions: []
  path_filters: []
  path_instructions: []
  abort_on_close: true
  auto_review:
    enabled: true
    auto_incremental_review: true
    ignore_title_keywords: []
    labels: []
    drafts: false
    base_branches: []
  tools:
    shellcheck:
      enabled: true
    ruff:
      enabled: true
    markdownlint:
      enabled: true
    github-checks:
      enabled: true
      timeout_ms: 90000
    languagetool:
      enabled: true
      enabled_only: false
      level: default
    biome:
      enabled: true
    hadolint:
      enabled: true
    swiftlint:
      enabled: true
    phpstan:
      enabled: true
      level: default
    golangci-lint:
      enabled: true
    yamllint:
      enabled: true
    gitleaks:
      enabled: true
    checkov:
      enabled: true
    detekt:
      enabled: true
    eslint:
      enabled: true
    rubocop:
      enabled: true
    buf:
      enabled: true
    regal:
      enabled: true
    actionlint:
      enabled: true
    pmd:
      enabled: true
    cppcheck:
      enabled: true
    semgrep:
      enabled: true
    circleci:
      enabled: true
chat:
  auto_reply: true
knowledge_base:
  opt_out: false
  learnings:
    scope: auto
  issues:
    scope: auto
  jira:
    project_keys: []
  linear:
    team_keys: []
  pull_requests:
    scope: auto

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f084b58 and 26a6058.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/clang-format-check.yml (1 hunks)
  • CMakeLists.txt (2 hunks)
  • cmake/StandardProjectSettings.cmake (2 hunks)
  • tests/CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/clang-format-check.yml (1)

10-11: LGTM: Manual trigger addition is beneficial.

Adding the workflow_dispatch trigger is a good practice as it allows manual execution of formatting checks when needed.

tests/CMakeLists.txt (2)

Line range hint 1-35: Verify C++23 compatibility with dependencies.

The test executable links against several external libraries (CGAL, TBB, fmt, date-tz). Please ensure these dependencies are compatible with C++23.

Let's check the dependency requirements:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check dependency version requirements that might affect C++23 compatibility

# Check vcpkg.json for dependency versions
echo "Checking dependency versions..."
if [ -f "vcpkg.json" ]; then
    cat vcpkg.json
fi

# Look for any dependency-specific configuration
echo "Checking for dependency-specific configuration..."
rg -g "CMakeLists.txt" -A 3 "find_package|CGAL|TBB|fmt|date"

20-21: LGTM! Verify compiler support for C++23.

The upgrade to C++23 aligns with changes in other CMake files. However, since this PR aims to fix AppVeyor issues, ensure that the CI environment's compiler fully supports C++23.

Let's check the compiler requirements in the repository:

✅ Verification successful

C++23 upgrade is compatible with AppVeyor CI environment

The verification shows that:

  • AppVeyor uses Visual Studio 2022 with Clang-cl compiler
  • C++23 is consistently used across the project (all executables use cxx_std_23)
  • The project uses vcpkg for dependency management, which ensures compatible versions

The upgrade to C++23 in the test executable aligns with the project-wide standard and is supported by the CI environment's toolchain.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for minimum compiler version requirements or CI configuration
# that might specify compiler versions

# Check root CMakeLists.txt for compiler requirements
echo "Checking compiler requirements..."
rg -A 5 "cmake_minimum_required|compiler|MSVC|GNU|Clang" CMakeLists.txt

# Check CI configuration
echo "Checking AppVeyor configuration..."
rg -A 5 "image:|build:|compiler" .appveyor.yml

Length of output: 5571


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for compiler requirements and CI configuration more thoroughly

# Check root CMakeLists.txt for compiler requirements and C++ standard settings
echo "Checking CMakeLists.txt for compiler settings..."
rg "CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD|CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER|MSVC|GNU|Clang" CMakeLists.txt

# Check AppVeyor configuration
echo "Checking AppVeyor configuration..."
if [ -f ".appveyor.yml" ]; then
    cat .appveyor.yml
fi

# Check for any C++23 specific settings across all CMake files
echo "Checking C++23 usage across CMake files..."
fd -e cmake -e txt -x rg "cxx_std_23|CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD.*23"

# Check for any compiler version checks
echo "Checking for compiler version requirements..."
rg "CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION|check_cxx_compiler|COMPILER_ID"

Length of output: 3412

cmake/StandardProjectSettings.cmake (2)

58-64: LGTM! UTF-8 encoding configuration looks good.

The implementation correctly handles UTF-8 encoding for both MSVC and non-MSVC compilers. The /utf-8 option for MSVC and -finput-charset=UTF-8 for others are appropriate choices.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential UTF-8 encoding issues in source files

# Look for files with UTF-8 characters
echo "Checking for files containing UTF-8 characters..."
rg -l '[^\x00-\x7F]'

# Look for Unicode BOM markers
echo -e "\nChecking for files with BOM markers..."
fd -t f -x hexdump -C {} | rg 'ef bb bf'

41-44: Verify compiler support for C++23.

The upgrade to C++23 is significant. As C++23 is relatively new, please ensure all target compilers (especially MSVC, GCC, and Clang) fully support the C++23 features you plan to use.

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate another script to search for C++23 specific features since the previous output was focused on UTF-8 and documentation:


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response since we have sufficient information about C++23 feature usage and compiler requirements:

C++23 upgrade appears safe but requires attention to std::expected usage

The codebase currently only uses one C++23 feature - std::expected - which is used in several header files including Move_command.hpp, Ergodic_moves_3.hpp, and Apply_move.hpp. No other C++23-specific features (like std::generator, std::flat_map, std::mdspan, std::print, etc.) are being used.

  • The std::expected usage appears to be for error handling, which is a stable and widely-implemented C++23 feature
  • The project already has CI workflows for multiple compilers (GCC, Clang, MSVC) that would catch compatibility issues
  • The CMake configuration properly enforces C++23 with CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for C++23 compiler requirements in the codebase

# Search for C++23 specific features in the source code
echo "Searching for C++23 specific features..."
rg -l 'std::(expected|generator|flat_map|flat_set|mdspan|print|ranges::to|stacktrace)' 

# Look for compiler version requirements in documentation
echo -e "\nChecking documented compiler requirements..."
fd -g 'README*' -X cat
fd -g 'INSTALL*' -X cat

Length of output: 25616


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for C++23 specific features in source files

echo "Searching for C++23 features..."

# Search for C++23 specific features
echo "Checking for std::expected usage..."
rg "std::expected" -A 2

echo -e "\nChecking for std::generator usage..."
rg "std::generator" -A 2

echo -e "\nChecking for std::flat_map/flat_set usage..."
rg "std::(flat_map|flat_set)" -A 2

echo -e "\nChecking for std::mdspan usage..."
rg "std::mdspan" -A 2

echo -e "\nChecking for std::print usage..."
rg "std::print" -A 2

echo -e "\nChecking for std::ranges::to usage..."
rg "std::ranges::to" -A 2

echo -e "\nChecking for std::stacktrace usage..."
rg "std::stacktrace" -A 2

# Check compiler requirements in CMake files
echo -e "\nChecking compiler requirements in CMake files..."
fd -e cmake -X cat

Length of output: 15067

.coderabbit.yaml (1)

81-92: Verify integration requirements.

The configuration includes empty Jira and Linear integrations. If these integrations are not needed, consider removing them to maintain a cleaner configuration.

CMakeLists.txt (1)

79-80: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Fix comment style and verify Qt5 removal impact.

The commented-out line uses a different comment style (#) than the rest of the file. Also, ensure that removing the Qt5 component doesn't affect any existing functionality.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Qt5 dependencies in the codebase
# Note: This helps ensure Qt5 removal won't break existing features

# Look for Qt5 usage in source files
rg -g '!{build,vcpkg_installed}/*' '(Qt5|QT5|Qt\s|QWidget|QApplication)' .

# Check for Qt-related CMake configuration
rg -g '!{build,vcpkg_installed}/*' 'find_package\(.*Qt' .

Apply this diff to maintain consistent comment style:

-#find_package(CGAL CONFIG REQUIRED OPTIONAL_COMPONENTS Qt5)
+# find_package(CGAL CONFIG REQUIRED OPTIONAL_COMPONENTS Qt5)

.coderabbit.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.coderabbit.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.coderabbit.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CMakeLists.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
@acgetchell acgetchell self-assigned this Nov 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/bistellar-flip.cpp (1)

Confirmed: Invalid triangulation after bistellar flip requires attention

The issue is well-documented in both the source code (src/bistellar-flip.cpp) and tests (tests/Ergodic_moves_3_test.cpp). The current implementation only warns about the validation failure but continues execution, which could lead to incorrect triangulation state. This needs to be addressed by:

  1. Converting the WARN to a proper error handling mechanism
  2. Fixing the neighbor relationship update logic in the bistellar flip operation
  3. Adding validation checks before completing the flip operation
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 134-137: Critical: Address the FIXME comment regarding invalid triangulation

The triangulation becomes invalid after the bistellar flip due to incorrect neighbor relationships. This is a critical issue that needs addressing. Consider:

  1. Adding assertions to verify neighbor relationships
  2. Implementing proper neighbor updates during the flip operation
  3. Adding debug logging to track neighbor changes

Let's verify if this issue is documented or if there are similar cases:


Let me gather more context about this validation issue.


Let me check the implementation of the bistellar flip operation to understand how neighbors are handled.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar validation issues or related fixes
rg -g '!{*.md,*.txt}' -i "neighbor.*not.*neighbor|invalid.*triangulation" 

Length of output: 544


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation around the FIXME comment
rg -B 5 -A 5 "the flip neighbor of c has not c as neighbor" src/bistellar-flip.cpp

# Look for validation checks in the bistellar flip implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$) { 
  WARN($$$);
  $$$
}'  src/bistellar-flip.cpp

# Check for related test cases
rg -B 2 -A 2 "invalid.*triangulation|neighbor.*not.*neighbor" tests/

Length of output: 961


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for neighbor-related operations in bistellar flip
ast-grep --pattern 'void bistellar_flip($$$) {
  $$$
}' src/bistellar-flip.cpp

# Check for neighbor validation implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'bool is_valid($$$) {
  $$$
}' src/bistellar-flip.cpp

# Look for neighbor-related functions
rg -l "neighbor" src/

Length of output: 200

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26a6058 and 8daf99c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • .coderabbit.yaml is excluded by none and included by none
  • CMakeLists.txt is excluded by none and included by none
  • cmake/StandardProjectSettings.cmake is excluded by none and included by none
  • src/CMakeLists.txt is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/bistellar-flip.cpp (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/bistellar-flip.cpp (1)

Pattern src/**/*.cpp: Focus on performance, memory management, and RAII principles

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/bistellar-flip.cpp (1)

Line range hint 1-89: Well-structured code with robust error handling

The code demonstrates excellent practices:

  • Comprehensive error handling with specific catch blocks
  • Good use of RAII principles
  • Clear documentation and purpose

src/bistellar-flip.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8daf99c and 0add19b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)

.coderabbit.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.coderabbit.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
C++23 support check left out AppleClang
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/macos.yml (1)

Python cleanup is necessary but needs documentation

The cleanup is actually necessary as the workflow immediately installs a fresh Python version via Homebrew (brew install ... python). The existing symlinks could interfere with the new installation. However, this reasoning should be documented in the workflow.

  • Add a comment before the cleanup section explaining: "Remove existing Python symlinks to prevent conflicts with Homebrew's Python installation"
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 28-43: Verify the necessity of Python symlink cleanup.

The workflow includes extensive Python symlink cleanup steps. While this might be addressing specific issues, it would be helpful to document the reasoning.

Let's check if this cleanup is consistently applied across other workflows:

Consider adding a comment explaining why these cleanup steps are necessary.


Let me gather more context about this Python cleanup by checking the surrounding code and any related discussions.

This will help us understand:

  1. The complete workflow context where this cleanup is used
  2. Any related discussions that might explain this cleanup
  3. Any surrounding comments or steps that provide context
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if similar Python cleanup exists in other workflow files
rg -l "rm.*bin/python" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 71


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete workflow file to understand the context
cat .github/workflows/macos.yml

# Look for any related discussions or PRs
gh pr list --search "python cleanup macos" --state all
gh issue list --search "python cleanup macos" --state all

# Check if there are any comments in the workflow explaining this
rg -B 5 -A 5 "rm.*bin/python" .github/workflows/macos.yml

Length of output: 2272

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0add19b and ccb47e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/macos.yml (1 hunks)
  • CMakeLists.txt (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/macos.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/macos.yml (1)

3-11: LGTM! Well-structured workflow triggers.

The expanded trigger configuration is well-designed, providing automated runs for critical events while maintaining manual trigger capability. The branch specifications are appropriate for a typical Git workflow.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)

CMakeLists.txt (3)

33-33: LGTM: C++23 standard update

The upgrade to C++23 is properly implemented and supported by the compiler version checks added below.


70-78: LGTM: Comprehensive compiler version checks

Excellent implementation of compiler version checks for C++23 support. The version requirements are accurate for each compiler:

  • MSVC ≥ 19.34
  • GCC ≥ 12.2
  • Clang ≥ 16.0
  • AppleClang ≥ 14.0

89-90: Verify removal of CGAL Qt5 component

The simplification of CGAL dependency by removing the Qt5 optional component looks good. However, let's verify that no part of the codebase requires CGAL's Qt5 features.

✅ Verification successful

CGAL Qt5 component can be safely removed

The codebase scan shows no active usage of CGAL's Qt5 features. The only reference found was the commented-out line in CMakeLists.txt that we're reviewing. This confirms that removing the Qt5 optional component from CGAL configuration is safe.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any CGAL Qt5 dependencies in the codebase
# Look for CGAL Qt5 related includes or usage
rg -g '!{build,vcpkg_installed}/*' '(CGAL.*Qt|Qt.*CGAL)' .

# Check if any files include CGAL's Qt headers
rg -g '*.{h,hpp,cpp}' '#include.*CGAL.*Qt' .

Length of output: 184

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/macos.yml (1)

Line range hint 27-44: Consider making the cleanup step more robust

While cleaning up Python symlinks is good practice, the current implementation might fail if some files don't exist. Consider making the cleanup more resilient.

Here's a more robust approach:

     - name: Setup
       run: |
-        rm /usr/local/bin/2to3
-        rm /usr/local/bin/2to3-3.11
-        rm /usr/local/bin/2to3-3.12
-        rm /usr/local/bin/idle3
-        rm /usr/local/bin/idle3.11
-        rm /usr/local/bin/idle3.12
-        rm /usr/local/bin/pydoc3
-        rm /usr/local/bin/pydoc3.11
-        rm /usr/local/bin/pydoc3.12
-        rm /usr/local/bin/python3
-        rm /usr/local/bin/python3.11
-        rm /usr/local/bin/python3.12
-        rm /usr/local/bin/python3-config
-        rm /usr/local/bin/python3.11-config
-        rm /usr/local/bin/python3.12-config
+        # Remove Python symlinks if they exist
+        for file in \
+          /usr/local/bin/{2to3,idle3,pydoc3,python3,python3-config}{,-3.11,-3.12}; do
+          [ -L "$file" ] && rm "$file" || true
+        done
         brew install automake autoconf autoconf-archive libtool texinfo yasm ninja python ccache pkg-config

This approach:

  • Uses a single loop to handle all symlinks
  • Checks if files exist and are symlinks before removal
  • Continues even if some files are missing
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ccb47e7 and dea3aab.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/macos.yml (2 hunks)
  • CMakeLists.txt (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/macos.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)

🪛 GitHub Check: build
CMakeLists.txt

[failure] 77-77:
Clang 16.0 or higher required for C++23 support

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/macos.yml (1)

3-11: LGTM: Well-structured workflow triggers

The updated trigger configuration provides good coverage for automated CI:

  • Push events to main/develop ensure continuous integration
  • Pull requests to develop enable pre-merge validation
  • Workflow dispatch allows manual triggers when needed
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)

CMakeLists.txt (1)

33-33: LGTM: C++23 standard correctly configured.

The C++23 standard is properly set using target_compile_features on the project_options interface library, which will propagate to all targets linking against it.

CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
acgetchell and others added 2 commits November 1, 2024 20:53
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/bistellar-flip.cpp (2)

Line range hint 94-136: Consider strengthening RAII practices in test scenarios.

While CGAL handles most memory management, consider these improvements for better resource management and exception safety:

  1. Use std::unique_ptr for managing the triangulation in test scenarios
  2. Consider implementing RAII wrappers for CGAL resources if they're reused across tests

Example refactor for the test scenario:

class TriangulationFixture {
private:
    std::unique_ptr<ergodic_moves::Delaunay> triangulation;
    
public:
    TriangulationFixture() {
        auto vertices = bistellar_triangulation_vertices();
        triangulation = std::make_unique<ergodic_moves::Delaunay>(
            vertices.begin(), vertices.end());
    }
    
    auto get() -> ergodic_moves::Delaunay& { return *triangulation; }
};

Neighbor relationship validation failure requires immediate attention

The issue is confirmed through the test code which shows that after performing a bistellar flip, the triangulation's neighbor relationships become invalid. This is a critical issue as it affects the core functionality of the geometric operations.

Key findings:

  • The failure occurs specifically in the neighbor relationship validation after the flip operation
  • The code uses CGAL's Delaunay triangulation and performs geometric validation
  • The issue is reproducible and tracked in the test suite

Recommended actions:

  1. Add debug logging before and after the flip to track cell neighbor relationships
  2. Verify that all neighbor pointers are properly updated during the flip operation
  3. Consider adding invariant checks at each step of the flip operation
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 134-136: Critical: Address triangulation validation failure after bistellar flip.

The FIXME comment indicates that the triangulation becomes invalid after the flip operation due to incorrect neighbor relationships. This could lead to undefined behavior in subsequent operations.

Let's verify if this is a known CGAL issue:

Would you like help implementing additional debug logging or creating a minimal reproduction case to track down this issue?


Let me gather more context about this issue by examining the surrounding code and error handling.


Let me check one more thing to understand the validation and flip implementation better.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar issues in CGAL documentation and header files
rg -i "neighbor.*not.*neighbor|invalid.*after.*flip" --type cpp

Length of output: 241


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the error message and FIXME comment
rg -B 5 -A 5 "flip neighbor.*not.*neighbor" src/bistellar-flip.cpp

# Look for flip validation or error handling code
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$) {
  $$$
  throw $$$;
  $$$
}'  src/bistellar-flip.cpp

Length of output: 507


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for the flip implementation and validation checks
ast-grep --pattern 'bool is_valid() {
  $$$
}' src/bistellar-flip.cpp

# Check for CGAL triangulation validation calls
rg -B 2 -A 2 "is_valid|flip" src/bistellar-flip.cpp

Length of output: 1818

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dea3aab and d1c5ff9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/bistellar-flip.cpp (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/bistellar-flip.cpp (1)

Pattern src/**/*.cpp: Focus on performance, memory management, and RAII principles

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/bistellar-flip.cpp (1)

72-74: LGTM! Visualization configuration implemented as suggested.

Note we also updated vcpkg
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1c5ff9 and 41fedd6.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .appveyor.yml (1 hunks)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/macos.yml (1 hunks)
  • CMakeLists.txt (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.appveyor.yml

[error] 22-22: too many spaces before colon

(colons)


[error] 23-23: too many spaces before colon

(colons)

🔇 Additional comments (8)
.appveyor.yml (1)

22-23: Review cache configuration changes

The modifications to cache behavior suggest addressing build stability issues:

  1. Setting APPVEYOR_SAVE_CACHE_ON_ERROR to false prevents potentially corrupted caches from being saved when builds fail
  2. Setting APPVEYOR_CACHE_SKIP_RESTORE to true ensures fresh dependencies by bypassing cached content

While this might increase build times, it's a reasonable approach to resolve cache-related issues. However, once the build issues are resolved, consider re-enabling cache restoration for faster builds.

Let's verify the cache paths are consistent:

✅ Verification successful

The complete file content will help us verify:

  1. If the cache paths are properly configured relative to other settings
  2. If there are any other cache-related configurations that might interact with our changes
  3. The overall context of where these cache settings are being applied

Cache configuration is properly set up and aligned with build requirements

The cache configuration is well-structured and appropriate for a vcpkg-based C++ project:

  • Cache paths correctly target vcpkg archives and packages
  • Disabling cache on error and skipping restore is a valid strategy for addressing build stability
  • Cache settings are properly integrated with vcpkg configuration and build environment

The changes are reasonable and consistent with the project's build requirements. Once build stability improves, you may want to re-enable cache restoration by setting APPVEYOR_CACHE_SKIP_RESTORE to false for faster builds.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify cache paths exist in the configuration
rg "cache:" -A 3 .appveyor.yml

Length of output: 119


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other cache-related configurations in the file
# and verify the overall structure of the AppVeyor configuration
cat .appveyor.yml

Length of output: 1944

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 22-22: too many spaces before colon

(colons)


[error] 23-23: too many spaces before colon

(colons)

.coderabbit.yaml (3)

1-4: LGTM! Basic configuration is well-structured.

The language setting and tone instructions are clear and appropriate. The tone instructions effectively guide reviewers to maintain professionalism while focusing on technical accuracy.


5-30: Excellent review configuration with detailed path instructions!

The review settings are comprehensive and well-structured. The path instructions for C++ files are particularly valuable, providing clear guidance for:

  • Performance and RAII principles in source files
  • Design patterns in header files
  • Comprehensive test coverage with doctest

31-37: Well-configured auto-review settings!

The auto-review configuration maximizes coverage by enabling incremental reviews and including draft PRs, which helps catch issues early in the development process.

CMakeLists.txt (4)

Line range hint 1-32: LGTM: Well-structured CMake configuration.

The project setup with vcpkg integration and CMake configuration is clean and follows best practices.


70-83: LGTM: Comprehensive compiler version checks for C++23.

The implementation includes:

  • Clear documentation of minimum compiler versions
  • Appropriate version requirements for each compiler
  • Helpful error messages

Line range hint 94-99: LGTM: Clean CGAL configuration.

The simplified CGAL configuration with flag override prevention is appropriate and well-implemented.


33-33: Verify dependency compatibility with C++23.

The upgrade to C++23 is significant. Please ensure all dependencies (CGAL, Eigen3, fmt, etc.) are compatible with C++23 features.

.github/workflows/macos.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.appveyor.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.coderabbit.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.coderabbit.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@acgetchell acgetchell merged commit 6d8a435 into develop Nov 5, 2024
@acgetchell acgetchell deleted the feature/fix-appveyor branch November 5, 2024 21:28
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 5, 2024

@acgetchell
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai configuration

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

CodeRabbit configuration
language: en-US
tone_instructions: >-
  Be constructive and professional. Focus on technical accuracy while
  maintaining a friendly tone.
early_access: true
enable_free_tier: true
reviews:
  profile: assertive
  request_changes_workflow: false
  high_level_summary: true
  high_level_summary_placeholder: '@coderabbitai summary'
  auto_title_placeholder: '@coderabbitai'
  review_status: true
  commit_status: true
  poem: true
  collapse_walkthrough: false
  sequence_diagrams: true
  changed_files_summary: true
  labeling_instructions: []
  path_filters: []
  path_instructions:
    - path: src/**/*.cpp
      instructions: Focus on performance, memory management, and RAII principles
    - path: include/**/*.hpp
      instructions: Focus on design patterns, interfaces, and encapsulation
    - path: test/**/*.cpp
      instructions: >
        Review the following unit test code written using doctest. Ensure the
        following:
          - Comprehensive test coverage and proper test organization.
          - The code adheres to best practices using doctest.
          - Descriptive test names are used to clearly convey the intent of each test.
  abort_on_close: true
  auto_review:
    enabled: true
    auto_incremental_review: true
    ignore_title_keywords: []
    labels: []
    drafts: true
    base_branches: []
  tools:
    shellcheck:
      enabled: true
    ruff:
      enabled: true
    markdownlint:
      enabled: true
    github-checks:
      enabled: true
      timeout_ms: 90000
    languagetool:
      enabled: true
      enabled_only: false
      level: default
    biome:
      enabled: true
    hadolint:
      enabled: true
    swiftlint:
      enabled: true
    phpstan:
      enabled: true
      level: default
    golangci-lint:
      enabled: true
    yamllint:
      enabled: true
    gitleaks:
      enabled: true
    checkov:
      enabled: true
    detekt:
      enabled: true
    eslint:
      enabled: true
    rubocop:
      enabled: true
    buf:
      enabled: true
    regal:
      enabled: true
    actionlint:
      enabled: true
    pmd:
      enabled: true
    cppcheck:
      enabled: true
    semgrep:
      enabled: true
    circleci:
      enabled: true
chat:
  auto_reply: true
knowledge_base:
  opt_out: false
  learnings:
    scope: auto
  issues:
    scope: auto
  jira:
    project_keys: []
  linear:
    team_keys: []
  pull_requests:
    scope: auto

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant