Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't overwrite annotated tags with commit object #697

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bk2204
Copy link

@bk2204 bk2204 commented Feb 14, 2022

When checking out a repository with full history, a full clone is done and then the ref is finally updated to point to the commit that caused the workflow to be run. Normally, this is a good protection against someone pushing to the repository twice in short succession, but it causes problems with annotated tags.

Specifically, because the entry in refs/tags is set to the commit hash, if an annotated tag was used, the tag is turned merely into a lightweight one, which breaks git describe. Every other tag in the repository will continue to remain a valid annotated tag except the one for which the workflow was invoked, which is not what the user expected.

Let's work around this by not performing a fetch if what we're fetching is a tag. Technically, annotated tags can be anywhere in the hierarchy at any ref, but this should work as a suitable heuristic for now.

Note that the proper solution would be to expose the revision of the actual object and check against that instead of the commit, but it doesn't presently appear that that information is exposed. Also, we explicitly do not case-fold since Git refs are case sensitive.

This mostly addresses #290.

When checking out a repository with full history, a full clone is done
and then the ref is finally updated to point to the commit that caused
the workflow to be run.  Normally, this is a good protection against
someone pushing to the repository twice in short succession, but it
causes problems with annotated tags.

Specifically, because the entry in refs/tags is set to the commit hash,
if an annotated tag was used, the tag is turned merely into a
lightweight one, which breaks `git describe`.  Every other tag in the
repository will continue to remain a valid annotated tag except the one
for which the workflow was invoked, which is not what the user expected.

Let's work around this by not performing a fetch if what we're fetching
is a tag.  Technically, annotated tags can be anywhere in the hierarchy
at any ref, but this should work as a suitable heuristic for now.

Note that the proper solution would be to expose the revision of the
actual object and check against that instead of the commit, but it
doesn't presently appear that that information is exposed.  Also, we
explicitly do not case-fold since Git refs are case sensitive.
@martinpitt
Copy link

I keep running into this bug. This is the standard workaround which is in all our cockpit projects, as well as my own now:

      - name: Workaround for https://github.com/actions/checkout/pull/697
        run: git fetch --force origin $(git describe --tags):refs/tags/$(git describe --tags)

martinpitt added a commit to martinpitt/umockdev that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2022
martinpitt added a commit to martinpitt/umockdev that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2022
martinpitt added a commit to martinpitt/python-dbusmock that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Rycieos added a commit to Rycieos/actions-checkout that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
Currently, a check is done after fetch to ensure that the repo state has
not changed since the workflow was triggered. This check will reset the
checkout to the commit that triggered the workflow, even if the branch
or tag has moved since.

The issue is that the check currently sees what "object" the ref points
to. For an annotated tag, that is the annotation, not the commit. This
means the check always fails for annotated tags, and they are reset to
the commit, losing the annotation. Losing the annotation can be fatal,
as `git describe` will only match annotated tags.

The fix is simple: check if the tag points at the right commit, ignoring
any other type of object. This is done with the <rev>^{commit} syntax.

From the git-rev-parse docs:
> <rev>^{<type>}, e.g. v0.99.8^{commit}
>  A suffix ^ followed by an object type name enclosed in brace pair
>  means dereference the object at <rev> recursively until an object of
>  type <type> is found or the object cannot be dereferenced anymore (in
>  which case, barf). For example, if <rev> is a commit-ish,
>  <rev>^{commit} describes the corresponding commit object. Similarly,
>  if <rev> is a tree-ish, <rev>^{tree} describes the corresponding tree
>  object.  <rev>^0 is a short-hand for <rev>^{commit}.

If the check still fails, we will still reset the tag to the commit,
losing the annotation. However, there is no way to truly recover in this
situtation, as GitHub does not capture the annotation on workflow start,
and since the history has changed, we can not trust the new tag to
contain the same data as it did before.

Fixes actions#290
Closes actions#697
martinpitt added a commit to mpitt-test-org/python-dbusmock that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants