Remove stale label when issue is tagged with exempt label after marking stale #136
Comments
|
I like this idea and may look at making a change. May take me some time so if you want to add the enhancement, feel free to submit a PR and I can review/merge. |
|
Good idea. |
|
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days |
|
Reopen please? @hross |
|
Will reopen and see if we get a PR/feedback. |
|
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days |
|
Up to avoid stale. |
|
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days |
|
Up to avoid stale. |
|
Pretty thrashy. "Up to avoid stale" is the new "+1"? :^P |
* refactor(issue): create a dedicated function to remove the stale label * refactor: prefix private methods with _ to make it consistent with others methods * feat(label): remove the stale label when labeled with an exempt one closes #136 * chore: fix logger issues due to rebase @hross I think there is a room for improvement regarding the class creation of the issue logger (code duplication) but I do not see how to do it without changing a lot of stuff; do you have an idea? * test: use strict equal and move the new test in a more logical position * docs(readme): fix parsing error of the default values in the table prettier was not liking the previous syntax
+1 ;) |
If an exempt label, e.g.
wipis added after the action ran and marked an issue asstaleit would be nice to remove thestalelabel by the action in the next run. Right now the code seems to only consider exempt labels for skipping but not removing previously labeled issues.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: