refactor: Make seeding config more understandable

[LuisFelipeCoelho]

Re-writing mostly all comments from seeding configuration to make them more understandable.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (04544d9) 49.48% compared to head (c3b546c) 49.48%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2652   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   49.48%   49.48%           
=======================================
  Files         474      474           
  Lines       27075    27075           
  Branches    12516    12516           
=======================================
  Hits        13399    13399           
  Misses       4762     4762           
  Partials     8914     8914           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

📊: Physics performance monitoring for c3b546c

Full contents

physmon summary

• ✅ CKF truth_smeared
• ✅ IVF truth_smeared
• ✅ AMVF truth_smeared
• ✅ Track Summary CKF truth_smeared
• ✅ Seeding truth_estimated
• ✅ CKF truth_estimated
• ✅ IVF truth_estimated
• ✅ AMVF truth_estimated
• ✅ Track Summary CKF truth_estimated
• ✅ Seeding seeded
• ✅ CKF seeded
• ✅ IVF seeded
• ✅ AMVF seeded
• ✅ AMVF (+grid seeder) seeded
• ✅ Track Summary CKF seeded
• ✅ Seeding orthogonal
• ✅ CKF orthogonal
• ✅ IVF orthogonal
• ✅ AMVF orthogonal
• ✅ Track Summary CKF orthogonal
• ✅ Ambisolver seeded
• ✅ Ambisolver orthogonal
• ✅ Seeding ttbar
• ✅ CKF ttbar
• ✅ Ambisolver
• ✅ Track Summary CKF ttbar
• ✅ AMVF ttbar
• ✅ AMVF (+grid seeder) ttbar
• ✅ Truth tracking (GSF)
• ✅ Truth tracking
• ✅ Particles fatras
• ✅ Particles geant4

[paulgessinger]

Do we have an idea why the physmon output changes?

[LuisFelipeCoelho]

Do we have an idea why the physmon output changes?

Maybe some default values of the orthogonal seeding were different from the default seeding, I will check if that is the case

[LuisFelipeCoelho]

FYI: @CarloVarni

[acts-project-service]

✅ Athena integration test results

✅ All tests successful

status	job
🟢	run_unit_tests
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsBenchmarkWithSpot.sh 8 100
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsWorkflow.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateAmbiguityResolution.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateResolvedTracks.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateTracks.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateActsCoreSpacePoints.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateActsSpacePoints.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateSeeds.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateOrthogonalSeeds.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateClusters.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsPersistifyEDM.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsGSFRefitting.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsKfRefitting.sh
🟢	run_ci_tests: python3 ../athena/Tracking/Acts/ActsGeometry/test/ActsExtrapolationAlgTest.py
🟢	run_ci_tests: python3 ../athena/Tracking/Acts/ActsGeometry/test/ActsITkTest.py
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run4_mc
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run2_data
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run3_mc
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run3_data
🟢	run_art_test: test_data18_13TeV_1000evt
🟢	run_art_test: test_ttbarPU40_reco

[paulgessinger]

This seems to fail the Athena build. Can you either make it so it's backward compatible @LuisFelipeCoelho or we need to hold this until v32 next week.

Build failure is likely because the branch is not even with main. I'll update and retrigger

[paulgessinger]

Ok it's green now, so good to go.

Invalidated by push of eb5a4b1