Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Set defaults for GreedyAmbiguityResolution #2784

Merged

Conversation

andiwand
Copy link
Contributor

@andiwand andiwand commented Dec 8, 2023

1000 iterations is not sufficient for some of our common workflows. I also set the parameter explicitly in the python examples

@andiwand andiwand added this to the next milestone Dec 8, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added Infrastructure Changes to build tools, continous integration, ... Component - Examples Affects the Examples module Ambiguity Resolution labels Dec 8, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (706be9f) 48.71% compared to head (56bbf68) 48.71%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2784   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.71%   48.71%           
=======================================
  Files         479      479           
  Lines       27898    27898           
  Branches    13177    13177           
=======================================
  Hits        13591    13591           
  Misses       4763     4763           
  Partials     9544     9544           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

AJPfleger
AJPfleger previously approved these changes Dec 8, 2023
@acts-policybot acts-policybot bot dismissed AJPfleger’s stale review December 8, 2023 15:56

Invalidated by push of 7e0cd1b

AJPfleger
AJPfleger previously approved these changes Dec 8, 2023
paulgessinger
paulgessinger previously approved these changes Dec 8, 2023
Copy link
Member

@paulgessinger paulgessinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this have a measurable runtime impact?

@andiwand
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does this have a measurable runtime impact?

I didn't check but it should not be too bad. The problem is that we were left with a bunch of duplicates in busy events because the number of iterations also determines how many tracks will be removed at max which was not sufficient in the ttbar case

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit d47f89d into acts-project:main Dec 11, 2023
53 checks passed
@andiwand andiwand deleted the refactor-greedy-ambi-solver-defaults branch December 11, 2023 08:11
@acts-project-service
Copy link
Collaborator

🔴 Athena integration test results [d47f89d]

🔴 Some tests have failed!

Please investigate the pipeline!

status job report
🟢 run_unit_tests
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsBenchmarkWithSpot.sh 8 100
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsWorkflow.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateAmbiguityResolution.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateResolvedTracks.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateTracks.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateActsCoreSpacePoints.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateActsSpacePoints.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateSeeds.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateOrthogonalSeeds.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsValidateClusters.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsPersistifyEDM.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsGSFRefitting.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: ../athena/AtlasTest/CITest/test/ActsKfRefitting.sh
🟢 run_ci_tests: python3 ../athena/Tracking/Acts/ActsGeometry/test/ActsExtrapolationAlgTest.py
🟢 run_ci_tests: python3 ../athena/Tracking/Acts/ActsGeometry/test/ActsITkTest.py
🟢 run_workflow_tests_run4_mc
🔴 run_workflow_tests_run2_data
🟢 run_workflow_tests_run3_mc
🟢 run_workflow_tests_run3_data
🟢 run_art_test: test_data18_13TeV_1000evt
🟢 run_art_test: test_ttbarPU40_reco

@acts-project-service acts-project-service added the Fails Athena tests This PR causes a failure in the Athena tests label Dec 11, 2023
@paulgessinger paulgessinger modified the milestones: next, v32.0.0 Jan 19, 2024
@paulgessinger paulgessinger removed the Fails Athena tests This PR causes a failure in the Athena tests label Jan 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ambiguity Resolution Changes Performance Component - Examples Affects the Examples module Infrastructure Changes to build tools, continous integration, ...
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants