fix: update full_chain_test.py to follow full_chain_odd.py #3956
Conversation
WalkthroughEnhancements to the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py (1)
280-280: Simplify the output directory logic, we should!Complex, this conditional assignment is. Easier to read, an explicit if-else structure would be. Hmmmm.
Consider this clearer structure:
- outputDirObj = outputDirLess if args.output_obj else outputDir if args.output_csv == 2 else None + outputDirObj = None + if args.output_obj: + outputDirObj = outputDirLess + elif args.output_csv == 2: + outputDirObj = outputDir
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py (3)
84-89: Approve these changes, I do!
Clear and consistent with other arguments, the new --output-obj option is. Well documented in help text, the changes to -cc behavior are. Hmmmm.
487-487: Consistent implementation, this is!
Both simulation methods, object output support now have. Balanced and harmonious, the Force is.
Also applies to: 513-513
84-89: Verify backward compatibility, we must!
Check if existing scripts and documentation, affected by these changes are. Search for references to output handling, we should.
Also applies to: 280-280, 487-487, 513-513
✅ Verification successful
Let me examine the implementation details and documentation content, I must. Clear understanding of the impact, this will provide.
Safe, these changes are! Backward compatibility, they maintain.
Through the Force, clear vision I have gained:
- Existing scripts handle output formats flexibly, they do
- New
--output-objoption, additive it is, disturbs not the existing paths - In all affected files, proper fallback handling exists through conditional statements
- Documentation reflects output format options, it does
The path to different output formats, well-established it is:
- CSV output through
outputDirCsvparameter - OBJ output through
outputDirObjparameter - Graceful handling when options disabled are
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing usage of output-related arguments
rg -l "output-csv|output-dir" --type py
# Search for documentation files that might need updates
fd -e md -e rst . | xargs rg -l "output.*format|command.*line.*option"
Length of output: 469
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation of output handling in the affected files
rg -A 5 "output.*csv|output.*dir|output.*obj" Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_odd.py Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_odd_LRT.py Examples/Scripts/Python/itk.py
# Check documentation content for output format descriptions
rg -A 5 "output.*format|csv.*output|obj.*output" docs/examples/python_bindings.rst docs/examples/examples.rst
Length of output: 18399
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py (1)
280-284: Simplify the output directory logic, we should!Complex, the nested conditional is. More readable, a simplified version would be.
Consider this clearer approach:
- outputDirObj = ( - outputDirLess - if args.output_obj - else outputDir if args.output_csv == 2 else None - ) + outputDirObj = None + if args.output_obj: + outputDirObj = outputDirLess + elif args.output_csv == 2: + outputDirObj = outputDir
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py (3)
84-89: Approve these changes, I do!
Clear and consistent with existing argument patterns, the new argument is. Well documented in help text, the changes are.
401-401: Verify edm4hep particle handling, we must!
Separate output for generator and simulation particles, this change creates. Align with PR objectives about particle fusion, it must.
491-491: Verify completeness of obj output support, we must!
Added to simulation functions, the obj output is. But check other visualization-capable functions, we should.
Also applies to: 517-517
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to find all output-related functions and their parameters. This will help us verify if there are other functions that could benefit from obj output support.
Complete, the obj output support is! Hmmmm.
Through the Force, searched the codebase extensively, I have. Only in simulation functions (addFatras and addGeant4), the obj output parameter exists. Correct, this implementation is, as:
- Obj output, for visualization of simulation hits, designed it was
- Other functions, need not this capability, they do
- In simulation writers only, the ObjSimHitWriter class used it is
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other functions that might benefit from obj output
rg -A 2 "outputDirRoot.*outputDirCsv" | grep -v "outputDirObj"
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for visualization or output related functions
ast-grep --pattern 'def add$_($$$) {
$$$
outputDir$_
$$$
}'
# Also search for any output directory related patterns
rg -B 2 -A 2 "outputDir[A-Z][a-zA-Z]+"
Length of output: 70021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py (1)
280-284: Simplify the output directory logic, we should!Complex, this conditional assignment is. Clearer structure, we can create.
Consider this simplified approach:
- outputDirObj = ( - outputDirLess - if args.output_obj - else outputDir if args.output_csv == 2 else None - ) + outputDirObj = None + if args.output_obj: + outputDirObj = outputDirLess + elif args.output_csv == 2: + outputDirObj = outputDir
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py (3)
84-89: Approve the new argument handling, I do!
Clear and consistent with PR objectives, these changes are. Support for --output-obj option, they add, hmm.
495-495: Consistent modifications to function calls, these are!
Properly propagated, the outputDirObj parameter is. To both addFatras and addGeant4 functions, it flows.
Also applies to: 521-521
405-405: Verify the EDM4hep particle handling, we must!
Fusing of initial and final simulation particles, this change enables. But verify its behavior with different input scenarios, we should.
✅ Verification successful
Consistent and well-integrated, the particle simulation configuration is!
Through the Force, I sense harmony in the implementation, hmm. The outputParticlesSimulation="particles_simulated" configuration, present it is across all chain tests - full_chain_test.py, full_chain_odd.py, and full_chain_odd_LRT.py. Consistent with the test reader configuration, this pattern is. No disturbance in the Force, I detect.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for EDM4hep particle handling in tests
rg -l "outputParticlesSimulation.*particles_simulated" -g "*.py" -g "test_*.py"
# Check for any existing test configurations
fd -g "*test*.py" -x grep -l "EDM4hep.*particles_simulated"
Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the test files for particle simulation configuration
rg -A 5 -B 5 "outputParticlesSimulation.*particles_simulated" Examples/Python/tests/test_reader.py
# Check implementation in full chain tests
rg -A 5 -B 5 "outputParticlesSimulation.*particles_simulated" Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py
# Inspect related EDM4hep configurations
rg "EDM4hep.*particle" Examples/Python/tests/test_reader.py
Length of output: 1164
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for particle simulation handling in test configurations
rg -A 10 "def test.*simulation" Examples/Python/tests/test_reader.py
# Look for particle-related assertions in tests
rg "assert.*particle" Examples/Python/tests/test_reader.py
# Check for particle configuration usage
rg -A 5 "particles_simulated" Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_odd.py Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_odd_LRT.py
Length of output: 1246
|
--output-objlike feat: introduction obj simhit writer #3180. Can also still use-ccto output all formats.--edm4hepinput specified (sync with refactor: Fuse initial and final sim particles in Examples #3804)Next, we should remove the command-line options for
full_chain_odd.py.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
--output-objargument for enabling object file output.Improvements
--output-csvargument to clarify output options.