ci: Lint updates #3958
ci: Lint updates #3958
Conversation
WalkthroughChange significant, it is. The GitHub Actions workflow in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🔇 Additional comments (5).github/workflows/checks.yml (3)Line range hint Proper dependencies installed, they are. Clang and required dev packages, present they be. Simple and focused, the check remains. Line range hint Dependencies from requirements file, installed they are. GitHub token, properly passed it is. Security practices, followed they are. Line range hint In codegen job, wisdom shown in uploading artifacts on failure. Debug information, preserved it will be. But verify the 'changed' path, we must. ✅ Verification successfulThe path, understand better we must. See the actual implementation, we shall. Correct, the path is. Artifacts, properly handled they are. Examined the script, I have. In CI environment, creates 'changed' directory it does, copying modified files with their full paths. Wise implementation this is, preserving the directory structure for debugging purposes. When codegen fails, these artifacts, valuable they become. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the 'changed' directory is created by the codegen script
rg -l "changed" CI/check_codegen
Length of output: 49 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let us see the content of check_codegen to understand the path
cat CI/check_codegen
# And examine the codegen script itself
fd codegen.py$ | xargs cat
Length of output: 1312 .pre-commit-config.yaml (2)
The "-w" flag added, allows codespell to fix spelling errors automatically. A powerful tool this is, but with great power comes great responsibility. Ensure proper ignore patterns in place, we must. ✅ Verification successfulSafe, the automatic spell correction is, young Padawan A well-maintained ignore list, I see. Common technical terms and intentional variations, it contains. Protected from unwanted changes, your codebase shall be. The Force is strong with your ignore patterns - specific, focused, and purposeful they are. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify codespell ignore patterns
if [ -f "./CI/codespell_ignore.txt" ]; then
echo "Content of ignore file:"
cat "./CI/codespell_ignore.txt"
else
echo "Warning: Ignore file not found!"
fi
Length of output: 288
Excluded are CI files with ✅ Verification successfulWisdom in the configuration, I have found. No paradox exists. The Force reveals that the The CI directory, many scripts and configuration files it contains. Check them for spelling, we need not, as tools and automation files they are. Yet the ignore file within, a valuable resource it remains, guiding codespell in its noble quest throughout the rest of the codebase. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if codespell ignore file is properly handled despite CI exclusion
rg "codespell" .pre-commit-config.yaml -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 416 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check if the codespell ignore file exists and its contents
ls -l ./CI/codespell_ignore.txt 2>/dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "=== Contents of codespell_ignore.txt ==="
cat ./CI/codespell_ignore.txt
fi
# Check if there are any other codespell ignore files in the repository
echo -e "\n=== Looking for other codespell ignore files ==="
fd "codespell.*ignore"
# Check what files are actually in CI directory
echo -e "\n=== Files in CI directory ==="
ls -la CI/
Length of output: 3569 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
Infrastructure
|
--- END COMMIT MESSAGE ---
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
missing_includes,fpe_masks,unused_files, andcodegenfor enhanced checks.Bug Fixes
codespellhook to better handle word corrections.Chores