Fix privacy filter #3472
Fix privacy filter #3472
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters Files ignored due to path filters (10)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple components in the desktop client. Key modifications include the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for actualbudget ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Bundle Stats — desktop-clientHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset
View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger
Smaller
Unchanged
|
Bundle Stats — loot-coreHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset No files were changed View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger No assets were bigger Smaller No assets were smaller Unchanged
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
upcoming-release-notes/3472.mdis excluded by!**/*.md
Files selected for processing (5)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/accounts/Balance.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/report/ReportComponents.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/rollover/RolloverComponents.tsx (3 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/spreadsheet/CellValue.tsx (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/accounts/Balance.jsx
Additional comments not posted (9)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/spreadsheet/CellValue.tsx (3)
96-96: LGTM!The rendering logic within the
PrivacyFiltercomponent is correct, and the formatting of the cell value remains unchanged.
91-95: Verify thePrivacyFiltercomponent's implementation.Ensure that the
PrivacyFiltercomponent correctly handles theactivationFiltersprop and applies the privacy filtering logic based on the provided conditions.Run the following script to verify the component's implementation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `PrivacyFilter` component's implementation. # Test: Check if the `PrivacyFilter` component correctly handles the `activationFilters` prop. Expect: The component to apply filtering based on the provided conditions. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function PrivacyFilter({ activationFilters, children }) { $$$ if (activationFilters.some($_)) { $$$ } $$$ }'
6-6: Verify thePrivacyFiltercomponent.Ensure that the
PrivacyFiltercomponent is correctly defined and exported in the../PrivacyFilterfile.Run the following script to verify the component:
Verification successful
PrivacyFiltercomponent verified successfully.The
PrivacyFiltercomponent is correctly defined and exported in the../PrivacyFilter.tsxfile. The import statement inCellValue.tsxis valid and will work as expected.
- The component is defined at
packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx- It's exported as a named function:
export function PrivacyFilter({ ... }) { ... }- The component implementation looks correct, with proper props and logic
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `PrivacyFilter` component is correctly defined and exported. # Test: Check if the `PrivacyFilter` component is defined and exported. Expect: A component definition. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function PrivacyFilter($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 167
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and export of the PrivacyFilter component # Test 1: Search for any export of PrivacyFilter echo "Searching for PrivacyFilter export:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export $_ PrivacyFilter' # Test 2: Locate the PrivacyFilter file echo -e "\nLocating PrivacyFilter file:" fd PrivacyFilter.tsx # Test 3: If PrivacyFilter file is found, display its contents echo -e "\nContents of PrivacyFilter file (if found):" fd PrivacyFilter.tsx -x cat {}Length of output: 4744
packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (2)
9-10: LGTM!The import statement for the
cssfunction from theglamorlibrary is valid and follows the correct syntax. Using CSS-in-JS libraries likeglamorcan provide a more modular and maintainable approach to styling React components.
182-193: Looks good!The transition from inline styles to a CSS-in-JS approach using the
glamorlibrary for theCellValueTextcomponent is a positive change. It improves the separation of concerns between styling and component logic.The styles are correctly defined using the
cssfunction and include the necessary properties such asoverflow,textOverflow,textAlign, a conditionalcursorstyle based on thedisabledprop, and a hover effect. The syntax follows the expected format for theglamorlibrary.packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/report/ReportComponents.tsx (2)
5-6: LGTM!Importing the
cssfunction from theglamorlibrary is a valid approach for CSS-in-JS styling in React components. This change aligns with the modular and reusable styling practices.
372-380: Refactoring to CSS-in-JS is a good approach.The change from inline styles to CSS-in-JS using the
glamorlibrary is a valid refactoring approach. It promotes a more modular and reusable styling pattern while maintaining the same visual behavior.The styles applied using the
cssfunction, including the pointer cursor, hover underline, and the result ofmakeAmountGrey, achieve the same styling effects as the original inline styles.This change aligns with best practices for styling React components.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/rollover/RolloverComponents.tsx (2)
364-370: LGTM!The refactor from inline styles to CSS-in-JS using
glamorlooks good. It improves maintainability and consistency without altering the component's behavior.
479-484: LGTM!The refactor from inline styles to CSS-in-JS using
glamorlooks good. It improves maintainability and consistency without altering the component's behavior.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/spreadsheet/CellValue.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
joel-jeremy
force-pushed
the
fix-privacy-filter
branch
from
0a725ea
to
eb7edc2
Compare
No description provided.