Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🧪 improving rules e2e test stability #3498

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MatissJanis
Copy link
Member

@MatissJanis MatissJanis commented Sep 24, 2024

#3482

I have not been able to reproduce this locally. But judging from the failing e2e test trace: the issue is that payee/category/account (one of the variables) is undefined. So I'm hoping this change will improve the e2e stability.

Screenshot 2024-09-24 at 21 00 08

Sample failure: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/actions/runs/11020812113/job/30606649587?pr=3491

@actual-github-bot actual-github-bot bot changed the title 🧪 improving rules e2e test stability [WIP] 🧪 improving rules e2e test stability Sep 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the mapValue function in the ManageRules.tsx file. The updates involve assigning default values of empty arrays to the destructured parameters payees, categories, and accounts. This change ensures that these parameters are always treated as arrays, which helps avoid errors when the function is invoked with undefined or null values.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/desktop-client/src/components/ManageRules.tsx Updated mapValue function signature to include default values for payees, categories, and accounts.

Suggested labels

:sparkles: Merged

Suggested reviewers

  • MikesGlitch

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Deploy Preview for actualbudget ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a83e12e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/actualbudget/deploys/66f31a78d96cd40008433421
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3498.demo.actualbudget.org
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

Bundle Stats — desktop-client

Hey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Files count Total bundle size % Changed
9 5.29 MB → 5.29 MB (+15 B) +0.00%
Changeset
File Δ Size
src/components/ManageRules.tsx 📈 +15 B (+0.17%) 8.6 kB → 8.61 kB
View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

Asset File Size % Changed
static/js/index.js 3.31 MB → 3.31 MB (+15 B) +0.00%

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset File Size % Changed
static/js/resize-observer.js 18.37 kB 0%
static/js/usePreviewTransactions.js 1.59 kB 0%
static/js/BackgroundImage.js 122.29 kB 0%
static/js/indexeddb-main-thread-worker-e59fee74.js 13.5 kB 0%
static/js/AppliedFilters.js 20.97 kB 0%
static/js/narrow.js 81.24 kB 0%
static/js/wide.js 225.27 kB 0%
static/js/ReportRouter.js 1.5 MB 0%

Copy link
Contributor

Bundle Stats — loot-core

Hey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Files count Total bundle size % Changed
1 1.19 MB 0%

Changeset

No files were changed

View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

No assets were bigger

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset File Size % Changed
kcab.worker.js 1.19 MB 0%

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/ManageRules.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-424: Suggestions for future improvements

While the current changes effectively address the immediate stability concerns, here are some suggestions for future improvements to the ManageRules component:

  1. Error Handling: Consider implementing more robust error handling for API calls and data processing. This could include using try-catch blocks or implementing a global error boundary.

  2. Data Fetching: The component uses the send function for API calls. Consider creating a custom hook or a centralized API service to manage these calls. This could improve code organization and make it easier to handle loading states and errors consistently.

  3. Performance Optimization: For larger datasets, consider implementing virtualization for the rule list to improve rendering performance.

  4. Accessibility: Ensure that all interactive elements are properly labeled and keyboard accessible.

These suggestions are not critical for the current PR but could be considered for future enhancements to further improve the component's robustness and maintainability.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3451bf and a83e12e.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • upcoming-release-notes/3498.md is excluded by !**/*.md
Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/ManageRules.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/ManageRules.tsx (2)

38-42: Excellent change to improve function robustness and test stability.

The addition of default empty array values for payees, categories, and accounts parameters in the mapValue function is a great improvement. This change directly addresses the issue mentioned in the PR objectives where undefined values were causing test failures.

Benefits of this change:

  1. Prevents potential errors when the function is called with undefined or null values.
  2. Enhances the overall stability of the component, particularly in e2e tests.
  3. Maintains backward compatibility while improving robustness.

This modification aligns well with the PR's goal of improving e2e test stability.


38-42: Positive impact on component stability

The changes to the mapValue function have a beneficial ripple effect throughout the component:

  1. The ruleToString function, which uses mapValue, becomes more robust against incomplete data.
  2. The filteredRules useMemo hook, which indirectly uses mapValue through ruleToString, also benefits from this increased stability.

These improvements contribute to the overall reliability of the ManageRules component, especially when dealing with edge cases or incomplete data sets.

@MatissJanis MatissJanis changed the title [WIP] 🧪 improving rules e2e test stability 🧪 improving rules e2e test stability Sep 24, 2024
@MatissJanis MatissJanis merged commit 9c2bb9b into master Sep 24, 2024
19 of 20 checks passed
@MatissJanis MatissJanis deleted the matiss/e2e-rules branch September 24, 2024 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants