-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🧪 improving rules e2e test stability #3498
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for actualbudget ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Bundle Stats — desktop-clientHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset
View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger
Smaller No assets were smaller Unchanged
|
Bundle Stats — loot-coreHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset No files were changed View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger No assets were bigger Smaller No assets were smaller Unchanged
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/ManageRules.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-424
: Suggestions for future improvementsWhile the current changes effectively address the immediate stability concerns, here are some suggestions for future improvements to the ManageRules component:
Error Handling: Consider implementing more robust error handling for API calls and data processing. This could include using try-catch blocks or implementing a global error boundary.
Data Fetching: The component uses the
send
function for API calls. Consider creating a custom hook or a centralized API service to manage these calls. This could improve code organization and make it easier to handle loading states and errors consistently.Performance Optimization: For larger datasets, consider implementing virtualization for the rule list to improve rendering performance.
Accessibility: Ensure that all interactive elements are properly labeled and keyboard accessible.
These suggestions are not critical for the current PR but could be considered for future enhancements to further improve the component's robustness and maintainability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
upcoming-release-notes/3498.md
is excluded by!**/*.md
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/ManageRules.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/ManageRules.tsx (2)
38-42
: Excellent change to improve function robustness and test stability.The addition of default empty array values for
payees
,categories
, andaccounts
parameters in themapValue
function is a great improvement. This change directly addresses the issue mentioned in the PR objectives where undefined values were causing test failures.Benefits of this change:
- Prevents potential errors when the function is called with undefined or null values.
- Enhances the overall stability of the component, particularly in e2e tests.
- Maintains backward compatibility while improving robustness.
This modification aligns well with the PR's goal of improving e2e test stability.
38-42
: Positive impact on component stabilityThe changes to the
mapValue
function have a beneficial ripple effect throughout the component:
- The
ruleToString
function, which usesmapValue
, becomes more robust against incomplete data.- The
filteredRules
useMemo hook, which indirectly usesmapValue
throughruleToString
, also benefits from this increased stability.These improvements contribute to the overall reliability of the ManageRules component, especially when dealing with edge cases or incomplete data sets.
#3482
I have not been able to reproduce this locally. But judging from the failing e2e test trace: the issue is that payee/category/account (one of the variables) is
undefined
. So I'm hoping this change will improve the e2e stability.Sample failure: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/actions/runs/11020812113/job/30606649587?pr=3491