Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade aegir from 37.12.1 to 44.1.1 #242

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adamlaska
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/ipfs-message-port-protocol/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116
  631  
medium severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-SERIALIZEJAVASCRIPT-6147607
  626  
high severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-MOCHA-2863123
  589  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

Copy link

google-cla bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants