-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[hlx deploy] must run hlx build #241
Comments
but I agree. I think we can add a forced build before each deploy. maybe with an extra flag to disable if one like: |
Should we also add a forced |
no. strains and actions are not related. |
[strainconfig] merge with petridish #241
@lkrapf had this issue, too.... |
I was also hit bit this today in adobe/helix-test-content-onedrive-auth#2 - pinging the developer experience theme, adobe/helix-home#40 to link this issue there. |
I understand the goal here is that developers shouldn't have to remember to run
If we should ever feel that developers must still be able to avoid (re)building for whatever reason, we could e.g.:
|
# [4.9.0](v4.8.1...v4.9.0) (2019-07-08) ### Features * **deploy:** must run hlx build ([#241](#241)) ([3981455](3981455))
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 4.9.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
While setting up my production environment and fixing some bugs, I had to run deploy multiple times. Even though I test with
hlx up
before running thehlx deploy
, the build is not up-to-date and I keep forgetting to runhlx build
. Testing on production is pretty slow, thus I keep losing time understanding why my changes did not have the expected result. The only reason is that the code is not live... Error prone and quite frequent.Describe the solution you'd like
hlx deploy
should either run ahlx build
for me. Telling me the build is not up to date would not be a good option because I never want to deploy an older version... (I could still checkout the old code if really needed)Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: