Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MWPW-157941 #788

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024
Merged

MWPW-157941 #788

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024

Conversation

Blainegunn
Copy link
Collaborator

Resolves : MWPW-157941

@Blainegunn Blainegunn added this to the 0.2437 milestone Sep 5, 2024
Copy link

aem-code-sync bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch and validate page speed.
In case there are problems, just click a checkbox below to rerun the respective action.

  • Re-run PSI checks
  • Re-sync branch
Commits

@Blainegunn Blainegunn added the trivial PR doesn't require E2E testing by a reviewer label Sep 5, 2024
@Blainegunn Blainegunn merged commit 9eb351d into stage Sep 5, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.79%. Comparing base (8436328) to head (79a6128).
Report is 2 commits behind head on stage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            stage     #788      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.77%   85.79%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        5464     5464              
==========================================
+ Hits         4687     4688       +1     
+ Misses        777      776       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
trivial PR doesn't require E2E testing by a reviewer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants