Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "MWPW-137282 - Action item block layout options" #2232

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

@mokimo mokimo requested a review from elan-tbx as a code owner April 30, 2024 10:24
Copy link
Contributor

aem-code-sync bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch and validate page speed.
In case there are problems, just click a checkbox below to rerun the respective action.

  • Re-run PSI checks
  • Re-sync branch
Commits

@mokimo mokimo added the trivial PR doesn't require E2E testing by a reviewer label Apr 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.66%. Comparing base (03e3278) to head (11217cb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            stage    #2232      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.63%   96.66%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         165      165              
  Lines       43539    43550      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits        42076    42096      +20     
+ Misses       1463     1454       -9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mokimo mokimo merged commit d75511c into stage Apr 30, 2024
12 of 14 checks passed
@mokimo mokimo deleted the revert-1501-sarchibeque/MWPW-137282-center-actions branch April 30, 2024 11:03
@mokimo mokimo mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
trivial PR doesn't require E2E testing by a reviewer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants