MWPW-162833 [nala][MEP] confirm the "any-marquee-section" selector

[jpratt2]

This nala tests checks the "any-marquee-section" selector per PR request 2884:

Resolves: MWPW-162833

Test URLs:

• Before: https://main--milo--adobecom.aem.page/?martech=off
• After: https://any-marquee-section--milo--adobecom.aem.page/?martech=off
• PSI check: https://any-marquee-section--milo--adobecom.aem.page/?martech=off

Here is an example of the nala test:
https://main--milo--adobecom.hlx.page/drafts/nala/features/personalization/any-marquee-section/any-marquee-section
compare with the default base page: https://main--milo--adobecom.hlx.page/drafts/nala/features/personalization/any-marquee-section/any-marquee-section?mep=%2Fdrafts%2Fnala%2Ffeatures%2Fpersonalization%2Fany-marquee-section%2Fany-marquee-section.json--default

Note how every type of marquee is listed on the base page and that all marquee types are replaced with text by using the any-marquee-section selector in the MEP manifest

[aem-code-sync]

Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch and validate page speed.
In case there are problems, just click a checkbox below to rerun the respective action.

• Re-run PSI checks
• Re-sync branch

Commits

• 35d79cf ✅ (latest)
• 96b93d1 ✅
• ba8eabf ✅
• 395a8b1 ✅
• 044990f ✅

[aem-code-sync]

	Page	Scores	Audits	Google
📱	/?martech=off
🖥️	/?martech=off

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.38%. Comparing base (6f4d98c) to head (35d79cf).
Report is 5 commits behind head on stage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            stage    #3229   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.37%   96.38%           
=======================================
  Files         245      245           
  Lines       56716    56716           
=======================================
+ Hits        54661    54665    +4     
+ Misses       2055     2051    -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jpratt2]

@skumar09 Please let me know if you accept how I used CSS locators within this test.

[github-actions]

This pull request is not passing all required checks. Please see this discussion for information on how to get all checks passing. Inconsistent checks can be manually retried. If a test absolutely can not pass for a good reason, please add a comment with an explanation to the PR.