Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Excluding Test8009761 because it needs a backported fix #5228

Merged

Conversation

adamfarley
Copy link
Contributor

Upstream bug JDK-8021775 changed this test in JDK9+ to include a 1+/- tolerance on the failing variable.

This fix was meant to be backported 10 years ago, but seems to have been forgotten about.

I've made sure that the associated Adoptium issue is tagged for an upcoming iteration, so we will be reminded to backport this fix after the April release.

P.S. A cherry-picked branch for the release branch has been prepared, as advised in my previous PR here.

Upstream bug JDK-8021775 changed this test in JDK9+ to include
a 1+/- tolerance on the failing variable.

This fix was meant to be backported 10 years ago, but seems to
have been forgotten about.

I've made sure that the associasted Adoptium issue is tagged for an
upcoming iteration, so we will be reminded to backport this fix
after the April release.

Signed-off-by: Adam Farley <adfarley@redhat.com>
@adamfarley
Copy link
Contributor Author

Linked to issue #5221, but does not resolve it.

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ compiler/tiered/Level2RecompilationTest.java https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tes
# compiler/6894807/IsInstanceTest.java https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium/issues/58 aix-all
compiler/6894807/IsInstanceTest.java https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/issues/2818 aix-all
compiler/8004051/Test8004051.java https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/issues/2818 aix-all
compiler/8009761/Test8009761.java https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/issues/5221 linux-ppc64le
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an upstream open issue like https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8021775 pointing to the issue on jdk8?

If so, then please use that issue instead of 5221 as the referring issue.
If not we ultimately should raise it and refer to it (and ultimately this test excluded upstream). In the meantime, we can bring this change in.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an upstream open issue like https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8021775 pointing to the issue on jdk8?

I searched, and didn't find an open upstream issue. There was one for the backport 10 years back, but it got deferred to JDK8u20, and (it appears) completely forgotten.

Lots of Test8009761 issues, but they're all closed or resolved.

If so, then please use that issue instead of 5221 as the referring issue. If not we ultimately should raise it and refer to it (and ultimately this test excluded upstream).

Agreed. I left a note for myself here, to be actioned after the release.

In the meantime, we can bring this change in.

👍

@sophia-guo sophia-guo merged commit 875f9e1 into adoptium:master Apr 16, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants