Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix realm normalization coverage #1233

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AssahBismarkabah
Copy link
Collaborator

@AssahBismarkabah AssahBismarkabah commented Dec 10, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): This is a fix for the open ticket #1207.
The change increases the coverage for the realm Normalization feature.

Special notes for your reviewer:

PR Readiness Checklist:

Complete these before marking the PR as ready to review:

  • the CHANGELOG.md release notes have been updated to reflect any significant (and particularly user-facing) changes introduced by this PR

@AssahBismarkabah AssahBismarkabah changed the title Feat/fix realm normalization coverage fix realm normalization coverage Dec 10, 2024
@AssahBismarkabah AssahBismarkabah marked this pull request as draft December 10, 2024 13:51
@AssahBismarkabah AssahBismarkabah marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 17:08
@AssahBismarkabah
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @thomasdarimont,

I’ve added additional test cases to ensure comprehensive coverage for the recent implementation. Please review them at your convenience and verify their correctness. The workflow has now been successfully completed.

@francis-pouatcha
Copy link
Member

@thomasdarimont can you rebase this onto your branch for a cleaner integration?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants