Add --workers option for multi-process operations #675
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dirtyhillbilly
force-pushed
the
feat-processpoolexecutor
branch
from
922347d
to
5f88109
Compare
dirtyhillbilly
force-pushed
the
feat-processpoolexecutor
branch
from
b321c52
to
e1e0813
Compare
1 similar comment
dirtyhillbilly
force-pushed
the
feat-processpoolexecutor
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ce945f4
to
41e34b8
Compare
dirtyhillbilly
force-pushed
the
feat-processpoolexecutor
branch
from
41e34b8
to
1381c0b
Compare
1 similar comment
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This MR allows checking files in a
ProcessPoolExecutorWith my test base (~6500 files), and quad-core i5 cpu,
--workers 0is twice as fast as sequential operations.