Skip to content

usememos/memos missing Secure cookie attribute

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Dec 23, 2022 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Jul 1, 2023

Package

gomod github.com/usememos/memos (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.9.0

Patched versions

0.9.0

Description

usememos/memos is an open-source, self-hosted memo hub with knowledge management and socialization. Memos prior to 0.9.0 is missing the Secure cookie attribute, making it vulnerable to session hijacking.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Dec 23, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Dec 23, 2022
Reviewed Dec 27, 2022
Last updated Jul 1, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

0.070%
(32nd percentile)

CVE ID

CVE-2022-4683

GHSA ID

GHSA-qcw2-492v-57xj

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.