Skip to content

Question about M92 #81

Answered by BackwardEcho
Electromente asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

The wrong M92 would be really obvious if you chose incorrectly. It would either go too fast and jam into the build surface when doing a G29 probing, or it wont even get there. Any improvement would come from using 114.28 or 114.29 for dimensional accuracy. Something to do with how the firmware rounds numbers giving us the 114.28 when I hear 114.29 is the actual number. You can get the height of a print to confirm if you want/ need the .29 or .28 if you've already adjusted the XY accuracy another way.

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by aegean-odyssey
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
3 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #78 on August 09, 2021 02:11.