Support up-to-date botocore

[jakob-keller]

Description of Change

This PR intends to improve general compatibility of aiobotocore within the Python ecosystem by relaxing the dependency specification of botocore, as well as boto3 and awscli.

Assumptions

• Upstream diff contains no relevant functional changes that require adjustments to the aiobotocore codebase.
• Upstream modernized its tooling, replacing pyupgrade, black, and flake8 by ruff. As a result, there are numerous formatting related diffs, which have been integrated into this codebase.
• In order to keep tooling aligned with upstream, aiobotocore also migrates to ruff for linting and formatting. This results in a number of additional changes, primarily related to formatting.

Checklist for All Submissions

• I have added change info to CHANGES.rst
• If this is resolving an issue (needed so future developers can determine if change is still necessary and under what conditions) (can be provided via link to issue with these details):
  • Detailed description of issue
  • Alternative methods considered (if any)
  • How issue is being resolved
  • How issue can be reproduced
• If this is providing a new feature (can be provided via link to issue with these details):
  • Detailed description of new feature
  • Why needed
  • Alternatives methods considered (if any)

Checklist when updating botocore and/or aiohttp versions

• I have read and followed CONTRIBUTING.rst
• I have updated test_patches.py where/if appropriate (also check if no changes necessary)
• I have ensured that the awscli/boto3 versions match the updated botocore version

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.57143% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.03%. Comparing base (42c8caa) to head (433470c).
Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
aiobotocore/httpchecksum.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
aiobotocore/client.py	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
aiobotocore/retryhandler.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
aiobotocore/waiter.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1131      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.03%   87.03%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          64       64              
  Lines        5970     5969       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         5196     5195       -1     
  Misses        774      774              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	87.03% <78.57%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jakob-keller]

@thehesiod: botocore just released 1.35.0 which contains a bunch of new logic. Before diving into that, I would love to merge this PR which provides compatibility for all recent 1.34.x releases.

Despite what codecov reports, test coverage is not actually any worse. The changes are purely due to new formatting provided by ruff. Yet, this is still blocking auto-merging for me.

Thanks for reviewing!

[jakob-keller]

@thehesiod: This would be the first PR to review ;-)

[jakob-keller]

@thehesiod: Thanks for reviewing and approving! You would need to perform the merge, since CodeCov isn't happy (enough). Also, this would be a candidate for a release, if you don't mind.

[jakob-keller]

Sorry, for all these PRs: I hope I'm not bothering you too much, @thehesiod!

[thehesiod]

Sorry, for all these PRs: I hope I'm not bothering you too much, @thehesiod!

no bother at all! thank you for all the help!