Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add types for Application and Response #3247

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 8, 2018

Conversation

seedofjoy
Copy link
Contributor

What do these changes do?

Add types for Application and Response

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

No

Related issue number

WIP on #1749

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

debug=...):
logger: logging.Logger=web_logger,
router: Optional[UrlDispatcher]=None,
middlewares: Sequence[_Middleware]=(),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should it be Optional? in case when middlewares=None it works fine

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's keep sequence. We have no explicit test for None, I don't want to keep the guarantee forever.
BTW 0 and 0.0 should work too but it is weird.

if body is not None and text is not None:
raise ValueError("body and text are not allowed together")

if headers is None:
headers = CIMultiDict()
elif not isinstance(headers, (CIMultiDict, CIMultiDictProxy)):
headers = CIMultiDict(headers)
else:
headers = cast(CIMultiDict, headers)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's ok doing like this? or I should do it in type checking scope?:

if TYPE_CHECKING:
    headers = cast(CIMultiDict, headers)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's keep the line as is

debug=...):
logger: logging.Logger=web_logger,
router: Optional[UrlDispatcher]=None,
middlewares: Sequence[_Middleware]=(),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's keep sequence. We have no explicit test for None, I don't want to keep the guarantee forever.
BTW 0 and 0.0 should work too but it is weird.

if body is not None and text is not None:
raise ValueError("body and text are not allowed together")

if headers is None:
headers = CIMultiDict()
elif not isinstance(headers, (CIMultiDict, CIMultiDictProxy)):
headers = CIMultiDict(headers)
else:
headers = cast(CIMultiDict, headers)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's keep the line as is

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

asvetlov commented Sep 6, 2018

Please make tests passing on Python 3.5

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3247 into master will decrease coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 80%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #3247     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   98.09%   97.99%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files          43       43             
  Lines        7871     7885     +14     
  Branches     1354     1354             
=========================================
+ Hits         7721     7727      +6     
- Misses         58       65      +7     
- Partials       92       93      +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
aiohttp/web_response.py 98.2% <100%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
aiohttp/web_app.py 96.53% <70.58%> (-1.86%) ⬇️
aiohttp/tcp_helpers.py 90% <0%> (-6.67%) ⬇️
aiohttp/client_reqrep.py 97.47% <0%> (-0.17%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 558519a...320af7e. Read the comment docs.

@seedofjoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please make tests passing on Python 3.5

done

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit 0f631fb into aio-libs:master Sep 8, 2018
@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

asvetlov commented Sep 8, 2018

thanks

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 28, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a [new issue] for related bugs.
If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion, please include those exceprts into that [new issue].
[new issue]: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/new

@lock lock bot added the outdated label Oct 28, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 28, 2019
@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Oct 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR outdated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants