Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle 403 and 404 issues in FileResponse class #8538

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 26, 2024

Conversation

steverep
Copy link
Member

@steverep steverep commented Jul 25, 2024

What do these changes do?

  • Move the check in the static handler for is_file() (i.e. exists and regular) to the FileResponse.prepare method. Revamp tests for non-regular files to be more realistic and robust.
  • Add a catch for permission errors when opening the file (which are not handled anywhere currently). Real and mock tests added here as well.
  • Remove the plain text file from the hello_txt test fixture which automatically now ensures compressed can exist without uncompressed variants.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

FileResponse class is now more robust.

Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?

No

Related issue number

Closes #8182

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES/ folder
    • name it <issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst (e.g. 588.bugfix.rst)

    • if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request
      number after creating the PR

      • .bugfix: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an
        improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match
        pre-agreed expectations.
      • .feature: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff.
      • .deprecation: A declaration of future API removals and breaking
        changes in behavior.
      • .breaking: When something public is removed in a breaking way.
        Could be deprecated in an earlier release.
      • .doc: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build
        process.
      • .packaging: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects
        and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and
        runtime assumptions.
      • .contrib: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g.
        Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development
        environment.
      • .misc: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above
        categories.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation,
      for example:

      Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files
      -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`.

      Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood,
      referring to what's changed compared to the last released version
      of this project.

@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Jul 25, 2024
aiohttp/web_fileresponse.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGES/8182.bugfix.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.68%. Comparing base (7108d64) to head (3bbdb13).
Report is 917 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8538   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.67%   97.68%           
=======================================
  Files         107      107           
  Lines       33288    33350   +62     
  Branches     3916     3918    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        32515    32578   +63     
  Misses        559      559           
+ Partials      214      213    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
CI-GHA 97.59% <98.80%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Linux 97.25% <97.61%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Windows 95.63% <77.38%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
OS-macOS 96.91% <97.61%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.10.11 97.06% <98.80%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.10.14 97.00% <97.61%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.11.9 97.23% <98.80%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.12.4 97.36% <98.80%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.8.10 95.39% <77.38%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
Py-3.8.18 96.89% <97.61%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.9.13 97.04% <98.80%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.9.19 96.99% <97.61%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-pypy7.3.16 96.56% <97.61%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
VM-macos 96.91% <97.61%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
VM-ubuntu 97.25% <97.61%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
VM-windows 95.63% <77.38%> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@bdraco bdraco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested on production HA instances. All good

@bdraco bdraco merged commit 4f834b6 into aio-libs:master Jul 26, 2024
37 of 38 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

patchback bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Backport to 3.10: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

❌ Failed to cleanly apply 4f834b6 on top of patchback/backports/3.10/4f834b646c23f74962e181170a40d872e76f4602/pr-8538

Backporting merged PR #8538 into master

  1. Ensure you have a local repo clone of your fork. Unless you cloned it
    from the upstream, this would be your origin remote.
  2. Make sure you have an upstream repo added as a remote too. In these
    instructions you'll refer to it by the name upstream. If you don't
    have it, here's how you can add it:
    $ git remote add upstream https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp.git
  3. Ensure you have the latest copy of upstream and prepare a branch
    that will hold the backported code:
    $ git fetch upstream
    $ git checkout -b patchback/backports/3.10/4f834b646c23f74962e181170a40d872e76f4602/pr-8538 upstream/3.10
  4. Now, cherry-pick PR Handle 403 and 404 issues in FileResponse class #8538 contents into that branch:
    $ git cherry-pick -x 4f834b646c23f74962e181170a40d872e76f4602
    If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit 4f834b646c23f74962e181170a40d872e76f4602 is a merge but no -m option was given., add -m 1 as follows instead:
    $ git cherry-pick -m1 -x 4f834b646c23f74962e181170a40d872e76f4602
  5. At this point, you'll probably encounter some merge conflicts. You must
    resolve them in to preserve the patch from PR Handle 403 and 404 issues in FileResponse class #8538 as close to the
    original as possible.
  6. Push this branch to your fork on GitHub:
    $ git push origin patchback/backports/3.10/4f834b646c23f74962e181170a40d872e76f4602/pr-8538
  7. Create a PR, ensure that the CI is green. If it's not — update it so that
    the tests and any other checks pass. This is it!
    Now relax and wait for the maintainers to process your pull request
    when they have some cycles to do reviews. Don't worry — they'll tell you if
    any improvements are necessary when the time comes!

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

@bdraco
Copy link
Member

bdraco commented Jul 26, 2024

Thanks @steverep

@steverep steverep deleted the fix-404-without-uncompressed branch July 26, 2024 20:02
steverep added a commit to steverep/aiohttp that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 4f834b6)

Co-authored-by: Steve Repsher <steverep@users.noreply.github.com>
bdraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 4f834b6)

<!-- Thank you for your contribution! -->

## What do these changes do?

<!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. -->

## Are there changes in behavior for the user?

<!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. -->

## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?

<!--
Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything
obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project?

Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next
5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much
love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be...

This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to
entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance!
-->

## Related issue number

<!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this
change? -->
<!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g.
'Fixes #123'). -->

## Checklist

- [ ] I think the code is well written
- [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist
- [ ] Documentation reflects the changes
- [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to
`CONTRIBUTORS.txt`
  * The format is &lt;Name&gt; &lt;Surname&gt;.
  * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
- [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder
  * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`)
  * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request
    number after creating the PR
    * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an
      improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match
      pre-agreed expectations.
    * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff.
    * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking
      changes in behavior.
    * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way.
      Could be deprecated in an earlier release.
    * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build
      process.
    * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects
      and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and
      runtime assumptions.
    * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g.
      Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development
      environment.
    * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above
      categories.
  * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation,
    for example:
    ```rst
    Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files
    -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`.
    ```

    Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood,
    referring to what's changed compared to the last released version
    of this project.
@@ -690,10 +690,7 @@ def _resolve_path_to_response(self, unresolved_path: Path) -> StreamResponse:
except PermissionError as error:
raise HTTPForbidden() from error

# Not a regular file or does not exist.
if not file_path.is_file():
raise HTTPNotFound()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

404 returned if only compressed file exists
3 participants