Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix segfaults when using kwargs on py3.12 #889

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Fix segfaults when using kwargs on py3.12 #889

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mind1m
Copy link

@mind1m mind1m commented Oct 4, 2023

What do these changes do?

If you use keyword args with py3.12, parser initialization causes a segfault.
It was noticed in #868 but actually there are more methods affected.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

No more segfaults on 3.12

Related issue number

#868

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> (e.g. 588.bugfix)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the PR
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files.

@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Oct 4, 2023
@mind1m mind1m closed this Dec 3, 2023
@zmedico
Copy link

zmedico commented Jan 11, 2024

@mind1m can you re-open this PR? It does appear to fix #868 for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants