🐛 Source Intercom: added state_checkpoint_interval for all incremental streams

[bazarnov]

What

Resolving: https://github.com/airbytehq/oncall/issues/328

How

• added state_checkpoint_interval for all incremental streams to emit state messages more frequently.

🚨 User Impact 🚨

No user impact.

Pre-merge Checklist

Expand the relevant checklist and delete the others.

Updating a connector

Community member or Airbyter

• Unit & integration tests added and passing. Community members, please provide proof of success locally e.g: screenshot or copy-paste unit, integration, and acceptance test output. To run acceptance tests for a Python connector, follow instructions in the README. For java connectors run ./gradlew :airbyte-integrations:connectors:<name>:integrationTest.
• Code reviews completed
• Documentation updated
  • Changelog updated in docs/integrations/<source or destination>/<name>.md including changelog. See changelog example
• PR name follows PR naming conventions

Airbyter

If this is a community PR, the Airbyte engineer reviewing this PR is responsible for the below items.

• Create a non-forked branch based on this PR and test the below items on it
• Build is successful
• If new credentials are required for use in CI, add them to GSM. Instructions.
• /test connector=connectors/<name> command is passing
• New Connector version released on Dockerhub and connector version bumped by running the /publish command described here

[bazarnov]

/test connector=connectors/source-intercom

🕑 connectors/source-intercom https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/2697281609
✅ connectors/source-intercom https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/2697281609
Python tests coverage:

Name                                                 Stmts   Miss  Cover
------------------------------------------------------------------------
source_acceptance_test/utils/__init__.py                 6      0   100%
source_acceptance_test/tests/__init__.py                 4      0   100%
source_acceptance_test/__init__.py                       2      0   100%
source_acceptance_test/tests/test_full_refresh.py       52      2    96%
source_acceptance_test/utils/asserts.py                 37      2    95%
source_acceptance_test/config.py                        77      6    92%
source_acceptance_test/utils/json_schema_helper.py     105     13    88%
source_acceptance_test/tests/test_incremental.py       121     25    79%
source_acceptance_test/utils/common.py                  80     17    79%
source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py              298    106    64%
source_acceptance_test/utils/compare.py                 62     23    63%
source_acceptance_test/base.py                          10      4    60%
source_acceptance_test/utils/connector_runner.py       110     48    56%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                                                  964    246    74%
Name                          Stmts   Miss  Cover
-------------------------------------------------
source_intercom/__init__.py       2      0   100%
source_intercom/utils.py         60      8    87%
source_intercom/source.py       256     42    84%
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                           318     50    84%
Name                          Stmts   Miss  Cover
-------------------------------------------------
source_intercom/__init__.py       2      0   100%
source_intercom/utils.py         60      1    98%
source_intercom/source.py       256     21    92%
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                           318     22    93%

Build Passed

Test summary info:

	 =========================== short test summary info ============================
	 SKIPPED [9] integration_tests/integration_test.py:33: need to refresh this test, it is very slow
	 �[33m============= �[32m2 passed�[0m, �[33m�[1m9 skipped�[0m, �[33m�[1m27 warnings�[0m�[33m in 68.77s (0:01:08)�[0m�[33m =============�[0m

[sherifnada]

implementation looks good - can you confirm that this is safe to do given how the API works?

[bazarnov]

implementation looks good - can you confirm that this is safe to do given how the API works?

Great question! During the tests, the order and the final records count were checked, should be safe to do.

[bazarnov]

/publish connector=connectors/source-intercom

🕑 Publishing the following connectors:
connectors/source-intercom
https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/2703513516

Connector	Did it publish?	Were definitions generated?
connectors/source-intercom	✅	✅

if you have connectors that successfully published but failed definition generation, follow step 4 here ▶️