Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure Local Secret Persistence is Initialized #21329

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2023

Conversation

jdpgrailsdev
Copy link
Contributor

What

  • Ensure that local testing persistence is initialized

How

  • Call intialize() before read/write

Recommended reading order

  1. LocalTestingSecretPersistence.java

@jdpgrailsdev jdpgrailsdev requested a review from a team as a code owner January 12, 2023 17:06
@jdpgrailsdev jdpgrailsdev changed the title Jonathan/local persistence init Ensure Local Secret Persistence is Initialized Jan 12, 2023
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ services:
- airbyte/server:${ALT_TAG:-${VERSION}}
platforms:
- linux/amd64
- linux/arm64
- linux/arm64
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this duplication needed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@benmoriceau Could you be more specific? The two entries are different (amd64 vs arm64)

@jdpgrailsdev jdpgrailsdev temporarily deployed to more-secrets January 12, 2023 17:08 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jdpgrailsdev jdpgrailsdev temporarily deployed to more-secrets January 12, 2023 17:09 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jdpgrailsdev jdpgrailsdev merged commit 5bc38f0 into master Jan 12, 2023
@jdpgrailsdev jdpgrailsdev deleted the jonathan/local-persistence-init branch January 12, 2023 17:58
jbfbell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
* Formatting

* Ensure that local persistence is initialized
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants