-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add perf feature-flag; ensure compatability with LaunchDarkly (LDv5) users #21534
Merged
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b53c506
init commit of flags.yml
colesnodgrass f42cd3a
add PerfBackgroundJsonValidation flag
colesnodgrass 6a108cf
update Multi contexts to support LDv5
colesnodgrass 17429d7
add test for no context behavior
colesnodgrass 445cae0
allow ConfigFileClient to support a null Path
colesnodgrass 23c6158
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into cole/ff-config
colesnodgrass c800338
add comment
colesnodgrass 9a2b5ec
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into cole/ff-config
colesnodgrass 68d8439
remove test that no longer applies
colesnodgrass 14b7676
change factory to always return one of the implementations
colesnodgrass f746100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into cole/ff-config
colesnodgrass e5dcdf7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into cole/ff-config
colesnodgrass 6a86b25
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into cole/ff-config
colesnodgrass 2026f82
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into cole/ff-config
colesnodgrass 94d64d4
add flags.yml config; quote ports
colesnodgrass 46bb5fe
replace @Requires annotations with hand-checking
colesnodgrass 4dc4ecc
make the code easier to read
colesnodgrass fe1b9c4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into cole/ff-config
colesnodgrass File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
flags: | ||
- name: performance.backgroundJsonSchemaValidation | ||
enabled: true |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Out of curiosity, Kotlin doesn't have a more succinct way to represent this type of if/else? Or, are you just avoiding using a ternary or elvis operator for stylistic/readability reasons?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kotlin doesn't have a ternary operator, instead having an
if/else
andwhen
expressions. The elvis operator only works when the left-hand side of the operator isnull
. As theconfigPath
variables cannot be null (it's aString
not aString?
) I would have to convert it to a null in order to use a elvis operator.Here I think it's a stylistic/readability choice.
Which one is easier to read?
if/else:
when:
elvis (actually doesn't need an elvis as we want the null value)
Having written these all out now, maybe I'll change this to use the
when
statement.