Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[airbyte-ci] Improved PR generation flow and a bugfix #38582

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

natikgadzhi
Copy link
Contributor

What

A batch of changes to airbyte-ci that @bleonard and I did to push up the poetry + base image migration PRs.

These seem to make sense universally, so I'm pushing them up:

  • Don't build connector image on poetry migration (it will be built in CI anyway)
  • Don't create a PR in up_to_date until asked to.
  • Bugfix in pull_request --bump

TODO

This still needs a version bump to airbyte-ci itself.

Can this PR be safely reverted and rolled back?

  • YES 💚
  • NO ❌

@natikgadzhi natikgadzhi requested a review from a team as a code owner May 22, 2024 21:29
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
airbyte-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 22, 2024 10:25pm

@natikgadzhi natikgadzhi changed the title Ng/airbyte ci tweaks [airbyte-ci] Improved PR generation flow and a bugfix May 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@girarda girarda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good thanks for fixing!

@@ -42,18 +42,23 @@
default=False,
help="Create a pull request.",
)

@click.option(
"--no-bump",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: the negative flag is a little confusing. why not --bump?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had the same thought, but honestly, good enough for an internal tool for now.

@natikgadzhi natikgadzhi enabled auto-merge (squash) May 22, 2024 22:21
@natikgadzhi natikgadzhi disabled auto-merge May 22, 2024 22:42
@natikgadzhi natikgadzhi merged commit a51456a into master May 22, 2024
27 of 29 checks passed
@natikgadzhi natikgadzhi deleted the ng/airbyte-ci-tweaks branch May 22, 2024 22:42
@natikgadzhi
Copy link
Contributor Author

One type check failed but given there are 593 of them total and I can't run just one file locally, I'm sorry, I'm merging this so I can easily document how to regen all those PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants